Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Rating Models and Validation - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Rating</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong><br />
available, the binomial test can be replaced with a test using st<strong>and</strong>ard normal<br />
distribution. 109<br />
Chart 76 below shows an example of how the binomial test would be performed<br />
for one row in a transition matrix. For each matrix field, we first calculate<br />
the test value on the left side of the inequality. We then compare this test<br />
value to the right side of the inequality for the 90% <strong>and</strong> 95% significance levels.<br />
Significant deviations between the forecast <strong>and</strong> realized transition rates are identified<br />
at the 90% level for transitions to classes 1b, 3a, 3b, <strong>and</strong> 3e. At the 95%<br />
significance level, only the underruns of forecast rates of transition to classes 1b<br />
<strong>and</strong> 3b are significant.<br />
In this context, class 1a is a special case because the forecast transition rate<br />
equals zero in this class. In this case, the test value used in the binomial test<br />
always equals 1, even if no transitions are observed. However, this is not considered<br />
a misestimate of the transition rate. If transitions are observed, the transition<br />
rate is obviously not equal to zero <strong>and</strong> would have to be adjusted accordingly.<br />
Chart 76: Data Example for Back-testing a Transition Matrix with the Binomial Test<br />
If significant deviations are identified between the forecast <strong>and</strong> realized transition<br />
rates, it is necessary to adjust the transition matrix. In the simplest of<br />
cases, the inaccurate values in the matrix are replaced with new values which<br />
are determined empirically. However, this can also bring about inconsistencies<br />
in the transition matrix which then make it necessary to smooth the matrix.<br />
There is no simple algorithmic method which enables the parallel adjustment<br />
of all transition frequencies to the required significance levels with due<br />
attention to the consistency rules. Therefore, practitioners often use pragmatic<br />
solutions in which parts of individual transition probabilities are shifted to<br />
neighboring classes out of heuristic considerations in order to adhere to the consistency<br />
rules. 110<br />
If multi-year transition matrices can be calculated directly from the data set,<br />
it is not absolutely necessary to adhere to the consistency rules. However, what<br />
is essential to the validity <strong>and</strong> practical viability of a rating model is the consis-<br />
109 Cf. the comments in section 6.2.2 on reviewing the significance of default rates.<br />
110 In mathematical terms, it is not even possible to ensure the existence of a solution in all cases.<br />
126 Guidelines on Credit Risk Management