01.09.2013 Views

Carbon dioxide removal in indirect gasification - SGC

Carbon dioxide removal in indirect gasification - SGC

Carbon dioxide removal in indirect gasification - SGC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SGC</strong> Rapport 2013:277<br />

1 Introduction<br />

The production of substitute natural gas (SNG) from biomass is an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

route for CO2 emissions reduction and substitution of fossil natural gas. SNG can<br />

be produced by <strong>gasification</strong> of biomass and subsequent upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the producer<br />

gas. In the <strong>gasification</strong> of biomass a producer gas, which ma<strong>in</strong>ly conta<strong>in</strong>s hydrogen,<br />

carbon monoxide, carbon <strong>dioxide</strong>, methane and water, is produced. This gas<br />

can be upgraded via for example methanation and CO2-<strong>removal</strong> to produce SNG.<br />

Several gas clean<strong>in</strong>g steps are also necessary.<br />

The produced methane may be used as vehicle fuel or <strong>in</strong> any other application<br />

where fossil-based natural gas is used. To be able to use the gas as vehicle gas<br />

or for export to the gas grid the Wobbe-<strong>in</strong>dex has to be adjusted to the correct <strong>in</strong>terval.<br />

If the gas is to be used as vehicle fuel the motor octane number also has to<br />

be sufficiently high. There are two ways of adjust<strong>in</strong>g the Wobbe-<strong>in</strong>dex and that is<br />

to either add a hydrocarbon with a higher energy density than methane or to remove<br />

carbon <strong>dioxide</strong>. This specific project focuses on the second way of adjust<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the Wobbe-<strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

1.1 Aim<br />

The purpose of the study was to <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether any of the exist<strong>in</strong>g carbon<br />

<strong>dioxide</strong> separation methods already used for biogas upgrad<strong>in</strong>g applications (water<br />

scrubb<strong>in</strong>g, am<strong>in</strong>e scrubb<strong>in</strong>g or PSA) is suitable for use <strong>in</strong> biomass <strong>gasification</strong> and<br />

subsequent SNG production.<br />

The <strong>gasification</strong> system simulations were performed us<strong>in</strong>g available operational<br />

data, models and literature <strong>in</strong>formation and focused on <strong>in</strong>direct <strong>gasification</strong> technology.<br />

Indirect <strong>gasification</strong> was chosen, as it is the biomass <strong>gasification</strong> technology<br />

with the most demonstration activities, the best data availability and the highest<br />

<strong>in</strong>herent methane formation. The technology is however limited with respect to<br />

scale-of-operation and thus the conclusions from this study will be relevant only up<br />

to circa 80-100 MWth.<br />

1.2 Report structure<br />

The structure of the report is as follows. A brief description on how SNG is produced<br />

from biomass through <strong>gasification</strong> will be given <strong>in</strong> section 2 together with a<br />

short summary of the exist<strong>in</strong>g plants. In section 3 different <strong>gasification</strong> technologies<br />

will be described as well as the most common gas impurities encountered <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>gasification</strong> and the exist<strong>in</strong>g gas clean<strong>in</strong>g technologies to address these issues. A<br />

review of the most common CO2-<strong>removal</strong> techniques will be presented <strong>in</strong> section<br />

4, which is divided <strong>in</strong>to physical absorption, chemical absorption and physical separation<br />

methods.<br />

To <strong>in</strong>vestigate which parameters that are of critical importance for the CO2<strong>removal</strong><br />

process a case study has been performed for small scale (10 MWth) and<br />

large scale (100 MWth) SNG-process. Two CO2-<strong>removal</strong> techniques have been<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the case study namely water scrubb<strong>in</strong>g (physical absorption) and<br />

am<strong>in</strong>e scrubb<strong>in</strong>g with MDEA/PZ (chemical absorption). These are described <strong>in</strong><br />

section 5 with a detailed discussions on the specific problems related to a gasifier<br />

product gas and the results of the case study are reported <strong>in</strong> section 6. Section 7<br />

summarizes the results for the entire project and section 8 is a summary of the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> conclusions drawn with<strong>in</strong> the project.<br />

12 Svenskt Gastekniskt Center AB, Malmö – www.sgc.se

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!