01.09.2013 Views

Carbon dioxide removal in indirect gasification - SGC

Carbon dioxide removal in indirect gasification - SGC

Carbon dioxide removal in indirect gasification - SGC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ܭெ ஽ா஺ = ௘ቀమయభ.రషభమబవమ ೅ షయల.ళఴ∙ౢ౤(೅)ቁ<br />

௘ ቀషవ.రభలఱషరమయర.వఴ<br />

೅<br />

ቁ<br />

<strong>SGC</strong> Rapport 2013:277<br />

Eq. I<br />

The calculations for the stripper column are executed <strong>in</strong> the same manner as<br />

those for the absorption column, with <strong>in</strong>tegral balances solved first, followed by the<br />

differential calculations. Because of the difficulties associated with solv<strong>in</strong>g the differential<br />

balances for the stripper, [34], a second method was also applied for the<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the stripper height. The second calculation method is a short-cutmethod<br />

that was developed to simplify stripper height calculations [80]. For this<br />

method, equilibrium data for the system is required, which was taken from the literature<br />

[81]. Data from the literature have also been used for the differential calculations<br />

for the stripper [63, 82-87]. The f<strong>in</strong>al stripper height was chosen to be the<br />

highest value obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the two methods applied. The reboiler duty for the<br />

stripper is determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the <strong>in</strong>tegral balances and the dimensions of the<br />

reboiler can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed from that data. This is also the case for the cool<strong>in</strong>g effect<br />

for the condenser. The dimensions of the heat exchangers are determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g conventional theory.<br />

In order to determ<strong>in</strong>e the amount of higher hydrocarbons that will be absorbed <strong>in</strong><br />

the am<strong>in</strong>e solution an <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the solubility was carried out. The Henry´s<br />

constant for the gases H2, CO, CH4, C2H4 and C6H6 were collected from the NIST<br />

database, which <strong>in</strong>clude the results of several studies. Mean estimates of all the<br />

values reported <strong>in</strong> the NIST database were used for evaluation of the solubility of<br />

the gases H2, CO, CH4, C2H4 and C6H6 <strong>in</strong> the am<strong>in</strong>e solution. The Henry´s constant<br />

used are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 4.<br />

Table 4. Summary of Henry´s constant used for evaluation of solubility from the<br />

NIST database.<br />

Component ࢑ ࡴ ,ࢉ࢖൫ࢀ ⊝ ൯((mol bar)/kg) ࡯ (K)<br />

H2 0.00078 543<br />

CO 0.00096 1400<br />

CH4 0.00135 1750<br />

C2H4 0.0047 1800<br />

C6H6 0.177 3950<br />

The Henry´s constant, ݇ ு ,௖௣, describes the relationship between the concentration<br />

of soluted gas <strong>in</strong> the liquid, ܿ ௔௤, and the partial pressure of the gas, ݌, accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Equation J. It is also dependent on the temperature accord<strong>in</strong>g to Equation K, were<br />

݇ ு ,௖௣൫ܶ ⊝ ൯denotes the value at the reference temperature, ܶ ⊝ 25°C, and ܥ is a<br />

constant given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.<br />

݇ ு ,௖௣ = ௖ೌ೜<br />

௣<br />

݇ ு ,௖௣ (ܶ) = ݇ ு ,௖௣൫ܶ ⊝ ൯݁ݔ݌൬ܥ ቀ ଵ<br />

்<br />

− ଵ<br />

் ⊝ቁ൰<br />

Eq. J<br />

Eq. K<br />

44 Svenskt Gastekniskt Center AB, Malmö – www.sgc.se

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!