18.09.2013 Views

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Socioeconomic Profiles of WFP Operational Areas and Beneficiaries<br />

Finally, as we noted above in observing income trends – see Figure 24 as well as Figure 26 –<br />

perceived poverty trends differ substantially according to the status of household head.<br />

Approximately 86 percent of female-headed households live in poverty; more than half (53<br />

percent) have remained poor and another one-third (34 percent) have descended into selfdescribed<br />

poverty during the last 10 years. In contrast, although 45 percent of male-headed<br />

households remain poor, nearly one-quarter of the others have managed to climb out of<br />

poverty. Female-headed households, as noted throughout this report, face many more<br />

structural, socioeconomic, and cultural barriers to achieving livelihood security than do<br />

male-headed households throughout rural Bangladesh.<br />

6. FOOD CONSUMPTION & FOOD SECURITY<br />

6.1 FOOD CONSUMPTION PATTERNS<br />

Table 50 presents results from the cross-tabulation of weekly consumption of 14 food groups<br />

by household socioeconomic status, specifically indicating the proportion of households<br />

consuming each food group as well as the number of occasions items from each food group<br />

were consumed during a one-week period. The results suggest that diet diversity, as<br />

measured by household consumption of the food groups, increases with household<br />

socioeconomic status:<br />

Table 50: Weekly Consumption of Food Groups by Household Socioeconomic Status<br />

Food Groups<br />

HH Socioeconomic Status<br />

Non<br />

vulnerable 2 3<br />

% of HHs<br />

consumed<br />

Number of<br />

times<br />

(Median)<br />

% of HHs<br />

consumed<br />

84<br />

Number of<br />

times<br />

(Median)<br />

% of HHs<br />

consumed<br />

Number of<br />

times<br />

(Median)<br />

Most<br />

vulnerable<br />

% of HHs<br />

consumed<br />

Staples/ grain 100% 21 100% 21 100% 21 100% 14<br />

Tubers 93.1% 10 89.7% 8 84.2% 7 75.3% 6<br />

Green leafy vegetables 98.4% 7 96.8% 6 94.4% 6 91.6% 6<br />

Other vegetables 74.7% 12 69.2% 8 55.9% 7 57.6% 6<br />

Lentils 94.2% 6 83.8% 4 69.6% 4 53.2% 3<br />

Fruits 90.3% 5 64.8% 3 27.8% 2 19.6% 2<br />

Meat 77.5% 3 40.2% 2 11.7% 1 5.6% 1<br />

Fish 98.2% 7 90.3% 5 80.9% 4 61.2% 4<br />

Egg 81.6% 4 55.5% 2 32.4% 2 16.6% 2<br />

Milk & dairy products 80.7% 7 47.0% 7 21.8% 7 10.7% 2<br />

Oils and fats 100% 20 99.8% 20 99.8% 18 99.5% 14<br />

Sugar 74.5% 7 39.2% 5 10.6% 4 3.8% 3<br />

Beverages 56.0% 7 23.1% 7 8.4% 7 2.7% 7<br />

Spices 99.4% 20 96.8% 20 95.1% 17 92.9% 14<br />

Number of<br />

times<br />

(Median)<br />

♦ Staples, invariably rice but occasionally wheat, are consumed by all households<br />

throughout the WFP priority zones.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!