18.09.2013 Views

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Socioeconomic Profiles of WFP Operational Areas and Beneficiaries<br />

mentioned above. Only 10 percent of the all households have retained membership status in<br />

more than one organisation. Not surprisingly, the proportion of vulnerable and invisible<br />

poor households with memberships in any organization is substantially lower than the<br />

proportion of non-vulnerable households (34 percent of invisible poor households have<br />

memberships compared to 65 percent of non-vulnerable households). One-quarter of the<br />

non-vulnerable households belong to two or more organizations. The large Chi Square value<br />

(202155.834) suggests that organizational membership is strongly correlated to household<br />

socioeconomic status. Political and social capital is strongly linked to socioeconomic<br />

wellbeing in rural Bangladesh.<br />

Table 30: Membership in Organizations by Socioeconomic Status<br />

% within HH socio economic status<br />

No membership<br />

Membership in one<br />

organization<br />

Membership in two<br />

organizations<br />

Membership in three and<br />

more organizations<br />

N<br />

Membership in organizations<br />

HH socio economic status<br />

Non<br />

Most<br />

Vulnerable 2 3 vulnerable Total<br />

35.3% 51.0% 60.2% 65.9% 53.9%<br />

40.0% 38.2% 32.5% 28.9% 35.2%<br />

17.6% 8.1% 6.1% 4.2% 8.3%<br />

7.1% 2.7% 1.2% 1.0% 2.6%<br />

414 993 858 396 2661<br />

A larger proportion of male-headed households (46 percent) have memberships in<br />

organisations compared to female-headed households (33 percent). Regional variation in<br />

organisational membership is minimal.<br />

Figure 17: Membership in Organizations by Socioeconomic Status<br />

% of households<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Union<br />

Parishad<br />

Different<br />

committees<br />

Memebership in Organizations<br />

Grameen<br />

Bank<br />

NGOs/ CBOs<br />

58<br />

Village court<br />

Govt. welfare<br />

recepient<br />

groups<br />

Professional<br />

organizations<br />

Non vulnerable 2 3 Most vulnerable<br />

As figure 17 indicates, nearly one-fourth of the study households pursue memberships in<br />

NGOs and CBOs. Many if not most of the NGO memberships relate to micro-enterprise<br />

activities (as discussed in the section above). Few households elicit any interest in joining<br />

government organizations (less than one percent), professional organisations (less than two<br />

percent), or Union Parishads (also less than two percent). Fewer than 20 percent of the<br />

Govt.<br />

organizations<br />

Other<br />

associations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!