18.09.2013 Views

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Socioeconomic Profiles of WFP Operational Areas and Beneficiaries<br />

The major problem is apparently not with the targeting process but continues to be with the<br />

selection process. Favouritism and patronage marked the old selection process within the<br />

UP structure. MWCA attempted to improve the process by creating Union VGD<br />

Committees, comprised of UP chairmen and members, partner NGOs, local government<br />

representatives, teachers, and current VGD participants, to be responsible for the selection of<br />

VGD women. Although the VGD selection process may have improved, it appears that<br />

many non-deserving households continue to be selected. Political, social, and perhaps<br />

financial influence may continue to plague the selection process at the union level.<br />

With regard to exclusion error in the programme, one reason, discussed above, is that very<br />

few VGD cards are available despite large numbers of extremely poor households who<br />

qualify for the VGD programme 6 . Table 32 starkly illustrates this reality: More than 80<br />

percent of invisible poor households and nearly 70 percent of vulnerable households have<br />

unsuccessfully attempted to procure VGD cards in the past. The VGD programme is well<br />

known: Only 16 percent of all households had no knowledge of VGD cards at the time of the<br />

survey. Non-vulnerable households are most knowledgeable about the VGD programme.<br />

More than 85 percent of non-vulnerable households and more than 40 percent of on-the-edge<br />

households acknowledged that their household income is either too high or they have no<br />

need for the card.<br />

% within Sex of household head<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Table 32: Why don’t Households have a VGD Card?<br />

% within HH socio economic status<br />

Do not know about<br />

the card<br />

Have tried in the past<br />

but did not get one<br />

Household income<br />

is too high to qualify<br />

Do not need<br />

Other reasons<br />

N<br />

Sex of household head<br />

Female Male<br />

Total<br />

14.8% 6.1% 6.6%<br />

85.2% 93.9% 93.4%<br />

Reason for Not Having a VGD Card<br />

Non<br />

vulnerable<br />

Table 33: VGD Cards by Sex of Household<br />

Head<br />

HH socio economic status<br />

On-the-<br />

Edge Vulnerable<br />

5.7% 17.6% 21.2% 15.2% 16.4%<br />

8.0% 39.1% 69.4% 81.5% 50.3%<br />

14.8% 8.6% 1.1% 5.9%<br />

71.0% 32.8% 6.8% 1.7% 25.9%<br />

.5% 1.9% 1.5% 1.6% 1.5%<br />

397 911 775 359 2442<br />

64<br />

Invisible<br />

Poor<br />

Total<br />

The VGD programme has been more<br />

successful in ensuring that women are the<br />

major beneficiaries. A higher proportion of<br />

female-headed households (15 percent)<br />

possess VGD cards than do male-headed<br />

households (six percent), although in<br />

absolute numbers, substantially more maleheaded<br />

households own VGD cards.<br />

6 HIES 2005 has estimated 27 million ultra poor or 5.4 million ultra poor households.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!