RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Socioeconomic Profiles of WFP Operational Areas and Beneficiaries<br />
water, placing a huge burden on household activities. Children suffer from diarrhoea,<br />
particularly during the rainy season, largely because water sources are unprotected and<br />
become easily contaminated. (Poor hygiene and sanitation practices also contribute to the<br />
prevalence of diarrhoea in CHT).<br />
Figure 10: Potable Water Source by WFP Priority Zone<br />
% of Households<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Access to Potable Water by WFP Region<br />
CHT Coastal Drought N/W Char Haor<br />
Tubewell Dug well<br />
WFP Region<br />
Spring/ river/ pond Other sources<br />
Access to potable water does not vary by household socioeconomic status or sex of<br />
household head. Although many poor households throughout the other five zones of the<br />
country (besides CHT) do not have their own tubewells, most households are able to access<br />
clean potable water from neighbours’ tubewells. Tubewells, however, do not necessarily<br />
yield water all year round, especially in the Coastal and Haor Zones, where tubewell water<br />
dries up during the dry months of the year.<br />
Community focus group discussions did not disclose concern about arsenic from the<br />
tubewell water, except in the Char and Haor Zones, where villagers are compelled to drink<br />
tubewell water contaminated with arsenic in absence of alternative sources of drinking<br />
water. In cases where arsenic has been identified, most communities in the study have been<br />
able to shut down the tubewell and shift to other apparently arsenic-free tubewells.<br />
2.3 SANITATION PRACTICE<br />
Figure 11 outlines household sanitation practices disaggregated by socioeconomic status.<br />
The results suggest that a large proportion of all households – more than one-third of all<br />
households – do not use any latrine or rely on hanging latrines, which represent unsafe<br />
sanitary practices. Household sanitation behaviour varies widely by socioeconomic class.<br />
Most invisible poor households (56 percent) do not use latrines while non-vulnerable<br />
households either rely on a pit latrine (54 percent) or a flush toilet (37 percent).<br />
Sanitation practices also offer large regional variations. Latrine use is most prominent in the<br />
Coastal zone and the CHT, but significantly more households in the CHT also use hanging<br />
latrines. Disaggregated data indicate that in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, substantially more<br />
Marma, Bawn, Tripura and Murang households do not use latrines (39 percent) compared to<br />
Bengali and Chakma households (six and nine percent respectively). One quarter of Chakma<br />
households, however use hanging latrines.<br />
44