RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Livelihoods in Rural Bangladesh: A Secondary Review of the Socio-Economic Context<br />
was wide variation between districts, ranging from a maximum per capita intake of 2,470<br />
kcal in Dinajpur to a minimum of 1,819 in Bagerhat.<br />
‘Very high’ food insecurity has been documented particularly in the northwest and along the<br />
major river systems, which are prone to drought and flooding at different times of year.<br />
Riparian areas are subject to the additional risk of riverbank erosion. Approximately ten<br />
million people live in close proximity to the major rivers in extreme erosion- and floodprone<br />
conditions. At least half of the land surface is subject to inundation. Even in a normal<br />
year, thousands of people lose their homes and lands to flooding, affecting approximately<br />
2,400 km 2 each year. Between 1982 and 1992, Bangladesh suffered a net loss to river<br />
erosion of 87,000 ha of mainly agricultural lands. Accreted lands do reappear further<br />
downstream as chars, but it is impossible to identify where the new land came from, and<br />
establishing title is a matter of power and influence, rather than compensation for loss.<br />
Informal settlers on char lands are among the poorest and most oppressed in the country.<br />
Half of all agricultural households are now classified as ‘functionally landless’, and it is<br />
estimated that over half of the rural landless in Bangladesh lost their land to riverbank<br />
erosion. Coastal communities, where cyclones and tidal waves are a regular threat to lives<br />
and livelihood assets, and the low-lying flood-prone haor areas of the northeast, are also<br />
amongst the most vulnerable regions of the country (Gill, 2003).<br />
Food security is characterized by gender bias – women are more food insecure than men –<br />
and by ethnic bias. Poverty and deprivation are substantially higher among the ethnic<br />
minority who populate the Chittagong Hill Tracts than among the mainstream population<br />
(Sutter, 2000). Perhaps surprisingly, it is also higher among the Muslim majority than among<br />
members of minority faiths. The proportion of Muslims living below the upper poverty line<br />
is 50.2%, compared with 45.9% for non-Muslims, while the corresponding figures for the<br />
lower poverty line are 34.4% and 27.6% respectively (Gill, 2003).<br />
Nutrition: Anthropometric measures for child nutritional status suggest that significant<br />
numbers of children in Bangladesh continue to suffer from malnutrition. The stunting rate<br />
for children in the age group 6-71 months declined from 68.7% in 1985/86 to 49% in<br />
1999/2000 and 43% by 2004. The proportion of underweight children in the same age group<br />
has seen a parallel decline from 72% to 51%. Notwithstanding these improvements, the<br />
absolute level of child malnutrition remains a critical developmental challenge. Seventeen<br />
percent of children throughout Bangladesh are severely stunted. The prevalence of stunting<br />
increases with age from 10% of children less than six months old to 51% of children aged<br />
48-59 months. Thirteen percent of Bangladesh children are considered to be underweight for<br />
their height or wasted and one percent is severely wasted. The wasting peaks at age of 12-23<br />
months at 24% and is 10% for children aged 48-59 months. Forty eight percent of children<br />
are considered underweight (low weight for age) and 13% are classified as severely<br />
underweight (BDHS 2004).<br />
Additionally, there are considerable rural-urban differences: 47% of rural children are<br />
stunted compared to 35% of urban children. Approximately half of the population live<br />
below the upper poverty line (2,122 kcal per day) and a third below the lower poverty line<br />
(1,805 kcal per day). Although food consumption among the poor is increasing,<br />
undernutrition indicators remain alarmingly high, and the rich-poor gap is growing. Women<br />
and girls are distinctly disadvantaged: the female-male gap for the severely stunted has<br />
increased from 10% in 1996/97 to 16% in 1999/00. Intra-household discrimination is one<br />
21