RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
RURAL BANGLADESH - PreventionWeb
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
one-quarter of the invisible poor consume three meals; most of the poorest households<br />
regularly eat two meals a day.<br />
Diet diversity, a proxy for nutritional adequacy and an essential aspect of food security, is<br />
clearly problematic for the poorest households in the WFP programming zones and should<br />
constitute a targeting indicator for food security programming. Two-thirds of invisible poor<br />
households consume seven or fewer items in the diet. In contrast, all non-vulnerable<br />
households consume more than nine items in the diet. Diet diversity appears to be<br />
problematic in the Coastal and Char zones and for female-headed households, half of which<br />
consume seven or fewer items daily. Food security, as measured by the number of months<br />
of adequate food, yields a similar pattern. More than nine of every ten non-vulnerable<br />
household have adequate food for at least ten months. In contrast more than half of the<br />
invisible poor never have adequate food throughout the year. The Char and Northwest<br />
zones appear to be the most food insecure regions of the country.<br />
The Coping Strategies Index: Households in rural Bangladesh employ a variety of<br />
strategies to cope with shocks, including economic, political and socio-cultural shocks as<br />
well as natural disasters such as flooding and cyclones. Not surprisingly, the poorest<br />
households tend to employ adaptive coping strategies far more frequently than do nonvulnerable<br />
households. A Coping Strategies Index (CSI) tool was used to capture these<br />
dynamics. Households experiencing food supply shortfalls were asked a series of questions<br />
regarding coping. Information on the frequency and severity of coping is recorded, and<br />
forms the basis for a CSI score. The CSI scores confirmed that relative to the other groups,<br />
the invisible poor and female-headed households feel compelled to resort to more severe<br />
coping strategies when managing food supply shortfalls:<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
Non-vulnerable HH: 12<br />
On-the-edge HH: 21<br />
Vulnerable HH: 21<br />
Invisible Poor HH: 33<br />
Male-headed HH: 23<br />
Female-headed HH: 36<br />
All Households: 24<br />
Most households employ a few common coping strategies during difficult periods of time of<br />
the year, or in response to a shock or abnormal event. The most commonly employed coping<br />
strategies include:<br />
Limiting portions at meal time;<br />
Relying on cheaper & less preferred foods;<br />
Borrowing food;<br />
Purchasing food on credit; and<br />
Reducing adult consumption to allow children to have adequate food.<br />
The CSI correlates closely with three measures of food security – dietary diversity, number<br />
of meals eaten in 24 hours, and access to adequate food. This result suggests that the CSI<br />
can be used as a proxy indicator to measure food insecurity in the WFP priority areas.<br />
xiv