In summary, it is fair to say that the findings discussed above consistently demonstrate an affinity by members <strong>of</strong> the non-TCK group with the concepts and terminology attributed by Pollock and Van Reken to the TCK experience. Conclusion In this study, I had set out to compare and contrast the experiences <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> non-TCKs and a group <strong>of</strong> TCKs, seeking to identify points <strong>of</strong> divergence and convergence in their experiences. <strong>The</strong> impetus for this work was the need to conduct a study with a carefully selected control group <strong>of</strong> non-TCK participants, in order to test whether or not Third Culture <strong>The</strong>ory suffers from the ‘Fallacy <strong>of</strong> Subjective Personal Validation’. Prior to undertaking the field research, it was expected that points <strong>of</strong> divergence between the two groups would emerge. It was also suspected that points <strong>of</strong> convergence may exist, but there was no data upon which to base such speculation. When the data obtained from the two groups was compared and analysed, clear areas <strong>of</strong> divergence arose from the findings and a number <strong>of</strong> points <strong>of</strong> convergence also materialised. Bearing in mind the exploratory nature <strong>of</strong> this study, these points <strong>of</strong> common junction are not presented as conclusive evidence for judging the credibility <strong>of</strong> the Third Culture Phenomenon. Rather, they provide a framework upon which to ground and construct a more detailed study, to formally test the validity <strong>of</strong> the suppositions and empirical statements made by Pollock and Van Reken concerning Third Culture and TCKs. A wider and more detailed exploration <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon, will no doubt reach a final conclusion as to whether or not Third Culture <strong>The</strong>ory does indeed suffer from ‘Fallacy <strong>of</strong> Subjective Personal Validation’. References Carroll, R.T. (1995). Forer Effect. <strong>The</strong> Skeptic’s Dictionary. http://skepdic.com/forer. html [accessed 18 April, 2006]. Dickson, D.H., and Kelly, I.W. (1985). “<strong>The</strong> barnum effect in personality assessment: a review <strong>of</strong> the literature”. Psychological Report, 57, pp.362-382. Forer, B.R. (1949). “<strong>The</strong> fallacy <strong>of</strong> personal validation: a classroom demonstration <strong>of</strong> gullibility”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Abnormal and Social Psychology 44, pp.118-119. McMillan, J.H. (2004). <strong>Education</strong>al Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer. Boston: Pearson <strong>Education</strong>, Inc. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Pollock, D.C., and Van Reken, R.E. (2003). Third culture kids: the experience <strong>of</strong> growing up among worlds. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing. Useem, R.H., Useem J., and Cottrell A.B. (1993). TCKs four times more likely to earn bachelor’s degrees. http://www.tckworld.com/useem/art2.html [accessed 18 April, 2006]. Van der Mescht, D. (2004). “Phenomenology in education: A case study in educational 40
leadership”. Indo-Pacific Journal <strong>of</strong> Phenomenology4(1), pp.1-16. http://www. ipjp.org/august2004/mescht4e1.pdf [accessed 10 May, 2006]. 41