25.10.2012 Views

Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...

Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...

Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2 Design <strong>of</strong> the interview evaluation 5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY<br />

A major drawback <strong>of</strong> the interview sessions, as they were set up in the basic<br />

design, was that it was almost impossible to keep track <strong>of</strong> all the information<br />

given by the test candidates.<br />

Furthermore, the interruptions <strong>of</strong> the given tasks which were needed to write down<br />

the information given by the evaluation candidates was described as a hinderance<br />

by the test candidates. Additionally, not all the information given during the pilot<br />

study could be written down as fast as it would have been necessary.<br />

As a direct result <strong>of</strong> this fact it was decided to record the complete interviews on<br />

tape during the final evaluation in order to be able to analyse the data after the<br />

interview.<br />

Another result <strong>of</strong> the pilot study was that it seemed necessary to interview the test<br />

candidates in a structured way to get meaningful data.<br />

During the pilot study, the questions the candidates were given at the different in-<br />

terview stages were not structured enough to represent the information given after<br />

each task. For example, the questions about the background <strong>of</strong> the educational<br />

experts were mainly asked in the pre-test interview instead <strong>of</strong> being parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

different interviews. Another example is the repetition <strong>of</strong> the questions about the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> the TLSs after the manual and the HEAT markup task. In the original<br />

design, the question had only been asked once after the HEAT markup task. Dur-<br />

ing the pilot study it proved necessary to get some information about the manual<br />

markup by the evaluation candidates to get insights concerning the framework and<br />

not only the HEAT.<br />

Finally, parts <strong>of</strong> the markup tasks were re-designed to avoid the repetition <strong>of</strong> sim-<br />

ilar tasks and to fill in more, different and more significant tasks.<br />

One decision that was made after the experience gained during the pilot study was<br />

to ask the test candidates to create several different TLSs and the corresponding<br />

EHPs. This resulted in a longer test duration but delivered a more significant<br />

insight into the usage <strong>of</strong> the framework. Another aspect that had not been included<br />

in the pilot study, but which was recommended by every pilot study test candidate<br />

is the explicit usage <strong>of</strong> the content space functionality <strong>of</strong> the HEAT.<br />

Altogether, the pilot study was a very important step to undertake before the real<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!