Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5.2 Design of the interview evaluation 5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY • If you had a problem with creating the Lecture-TLS, where and of what kind was it? The difficulties experienced during the creation of a Lecture-TLS were expected to be stated by the test participants and analysed. • How easy was it for you to link the TLSs together? The linking of the TLSs and the way the test participants experienced the difficulty of this task were expected to be stated by the candidates and analysed. • If you had a problem with linking the TLSs together, were and of what kind was it? The difficulties experienced during the linking of the TLSs were expected to be stated by the test participants and analysed. • How easy was it for you to reuse some existing material? The reuse of existing material is important for the success of this PhD. Therefore, it was also very important to know how the test candidates rated this functionality of the HEAT. • How easy was it for you to create the actual WWW material? The ease of creating educational material for the WWW by educational ex- perts canbe an indicator for the achievement of the research goals of this PhD. The test participants were asked to provide the necessary information about this material processing step. • How good is the presentation of the authored material in the WWW? The quality of the created material was to be rated by the test candidates. The gained information was expected to give valuable insights for the fur- ther development of the HEAT. • Did the completion of the first task help you to understand the HEAT? The completion of the first task should have enabled the test candidates to understand the framework upon which the HEAT is built. Therefore, the understanding of the HEAT was expected to have been easy for the test participants. 140
5.2 Design of the interview evaluation 5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY • Can you visualise how this tool could be used in preparing material for your teaching? If the test participants could imagine using the HEAT for their teaching and for delivering their material to their students, it would give some meaningful insights into the quality of the EFTECS and the HEAT. The post-test interview is important for the evaluation of the HEAT based markup test. The questions asked in the interview form the basis of the later evaluation and discussion of the markup test. Each interview was undertaken as a face-to-face interview and the participants’ answers were recorded on paper and on audio tape and transcribed (cf. appendix A.7.2). The post-test interview was designed to gain feedback on the HEAT and to give an insight into the participants’ understanding of the HEAT and the EFTECS. The designed tasksheet can be found in Appendix A.1, the worksheet in Appendix A.2 and the evaluation interviews in Appendix A.3. 141
Page 1 and 2:
Separation of educational and techn
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS CONTENTS Contents 1 Introd
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS CONTENTS 2.12.6 Java and J
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS CONTENTS 6 Interview evalu
Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS CONTENTS 7.3.5 Presentatio
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF FIGURES Lis
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF TABLES LIST OF TABLES List
Page 15 and 16:
List of Abbreviations ADL - Advance
Page 17 and 18:
Declaration This work has not previ
Page 19 and 20:
1 Introduction 1.1 Aim of project 1
Page 21 and 22:
1.4 Problem areas 1 INTRODUCTION ea
Page 23 and 24:
1.5 Approach 1 INTRODUCTION Secondl
Page 25 and 26:
2 Literature Review 2 LITERATURE RE
Page 27 and 28:
2.1 Definition and history of e-lea
Page 29 and 30:
2.2 Forms of e-learning 2 LITERATUR
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
2.3 Advantages and disadvantages of
Page 41 and 42:
2.4 Pedagogical elements and approa
Page 43 and 44:
2.4 Pedagogical elements and approa
Page 45 and 46:
2.5 Educational research 2 LITERATU
Page 47 and 48:
2.6 Teaching and learning strategie
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
2.7 E-learning and meta-data projec
Page 55 and 56:
2.7 E-learning and meta-data projec
Page 57 and 58:
2.8 Knowledge and learning objects
Page 59 and 60:
2.9 Project management and e-learni
Page 61 and 62:
2.9 Project management and e-learni
Page 63 and 64:
2.10 Reuse of material 2 LITERATURE
Page 65 and 66:
2.11 Adaptive Hypermedia System 2 L
Page 67 and 68:
2.11 Adaptive Hypermedia System 2 L
Page 69 and 70:
2.12 Technology 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Page 71 and 72:
2.12 Technology 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Page 73 and 74:
2.13 Research objectives 2 LITERATU
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Theoretical approach 3 EFTECS p
Page 77 and 78:
3.1 Theoretical approach 3 EFTECS A
Page 79 and 80:
3.2 EFTECS at EM-Layer 3 EFTECS mat
Page 81 and 82:
3.3 EFTECS at TLS-Layer 3 EFTECS
Page 83 and 84:
3.3 EFTECS at TLS-Layer 3 EFTECS Fo
Page 85 and 86:
3.4 EFTECS at EHP-Layer 3 EFTECS 3.
Page 87 and 88:
3.4 EFTECS at EHP-Layer 3 EFTECS 3.
Page 89 and 90: 3.6 Common meta-information 3 EFTEC
Page 91 and 92: 3.8 The complete EFTECS 3 EFTECS 3.
Page 93 and 94: 3.9 The eXtensible Educational Mark
Page 95 and 96: 4.1 General approach 4 HEAT 4.1.1 T
Page 97 and 98: 4.1 General approach 4 HEAT the dif
Page 99 and 100: 4.2 EHP-Layer 4 HEAT 4.2.2 Technica
Page 101 and 102: 4.3 EHP-Information 4 HEAT 4.3 EHP-
Page 103 and 104: 4.4 TLS-Layer 4 HEAT 4.4 TLS-Layer
Page 105 and 106: 4.4 TLS-Layer 4 HEAT Element Type x
Page 107 and 108: 4.5 EM-Layer 4 HEAT The important f
Page 109 and 110: 4.6 Content space 4 HEAT It was def
Page 111 and 112: 4.7 Material delivery 4 HEAT concep
Page 113 and 114: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT • Add
Page 115 and 116: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT Figure
Page 125 and 126: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT the aut
Page 127 and 128: 5 Evaluation methodology 5 EVALUATI
Page 129 and 130: 5.1 Analysis of alternative approac
Page 131 and 132: 5.2 Design of the interview evaluat
Page 139: 5.2 Design of the interview evaluat
Page 143 and 144: 5.3 Design of the practical evaluat
Page 145 and 146: 6 Interview evaluation 6 INTERVIEW
Page 147 and 148: 6.1 Analysis of the pre-test interv
Page 149 and 150: 6.1 Analysis of the pre-test interv
Page 151 and 152: 6.2 Analysis of the manual markup t
Page 153 and 154: 6.3 Analysis of the mid-test interv
Page 155 and 156: 6.3 Analysis of the mid-test interv
Page 157 and 158: 6.4 Analysis of the HEAT based mark
Page 159 and 160: 6.4 Analysis of the HEAT based mark
Page 161 and 162: 6.5 Analysis of the post-test inter
Page 163 and 164: 6.5 Analysis of the post-test inter
Page 165 and 166: 7 Practical evaluation 7 PRACTICAL
Page 167 and 168: 7.1 Design 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION O
Page 169 and 170: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
Page 171 and 172: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
Page 173 and 174: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
Page 175 and 176: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
Page 177 and 178: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
Page 179 and 180: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
Page 181 and 182: 8 Discussion 8 DISCUSSION The insig
Page 183 and 184: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
Page 185 and 186: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
Page 187 and 188: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
Page 189 and 190: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
Page 191 and 192:
8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
Page 193 and 194:
8.3 Critique of the study 8 DISCUSS
Page 195 and 196:
9 Conclusions 9 CONCLUSIONS In this
Page 197 and 198:
9.1 Research objectives 9 CONCLUSIO
Page 199 and 200:
9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS 9.2 F
Page 201 and 202:
9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS Howev
Page 203 and 204:
9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS therm
Page 205 and 206:
9.3 Contribution to knowledge 9 CON
Page 207 and 208:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [10] Robert J
Page 209 and 210:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [30] Kendall
Page 211 and 212:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [49] Barbara
Page 213 and 214:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [68] A.W. Str
Page 215 and 216:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [88] Melanie
Page 217 and 218:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [110] The Dep
Page 219 and 220:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [131] David A
Page 221 and 222:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [151] Michael
Page 223 and 224:
REFERENCES REFERENCES [174] Allianc
Page 225 and 226:
A Appendices 225 A APPENDICES
Page 227 and 228:
A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
A.2 Evaluation Worksheet A APPENDIC
Page 245 and 246:
A.3 Evaluation Interviews A APPENDI
Page 247 and 248:
A.4 Summary of interview results A
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES A.5
Page 259 and 260:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES entr
Page 261 and 262:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES docu
Page 263 and 264:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES { i
Page 265 and 266:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES } if
Page 267 and 268:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES answ
Page 269 and 270:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES A.5.
Page 271 and 272:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES //no
Page 273 and 274:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES
Page 275 and 276:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES { al
Page 277 and 278:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES { di
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES d
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES i
Page 287 and 288:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES dr
Page 289 and 290:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES A.5.
Page 291 and 292:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES disp
Page 293 and 294:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES } ]]
Page 295 and 296:
A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES tls
Page 297 and 298:
A.6 XEML - eXtensible Educational M
Page 299:
A.7 Contents of CD A APPENDICES A.7
show all

Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?