CHEM01200604005 A. K. Pathak - Homi Bhabha National Institute
CHEM01200604005 A. K. Pathak - Homi Bhabha National Institute
CHEM01200604005 A. K. Pathak - Homi Bhabha National Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Where, E[I •− 2 .nH 2 O] is the energy of the optimized I •− 2 .nH 2 O cluster and E s [I 2 .nH 2 O] is<br />
the single point energy of the I 2 .nH 2 O obtained by removing the extra electron from the<br />
optimized I •− 2 .nH 2 O cluster. VDE is the energy required to remove an electron from the<br />
anionic hydrated clusters. It is clearly observed that the conformer that has higher<br />
interaction energy, E int has higher VDE in each size (n) cluster. The weighted average<br />
VDE (VDE w ) is also calculated based on the statistical population of different conformers<br />
for each size (n) cluster and displayed in Table 2.1. Fig. 2.6-I displays the plot of VDE w<br />
vs. n showing the similar nature of shell closing at n=4 and n=8 as in case of E w<br />
int<br />
plot. It<br />
is worthwhile to mention that the variation of weighted average vertical detachment<br />
energy with the size of the cluster is similar for all other hydrated cluster, X. nH 2 O (X=<br />
Cl •− 2 , Br •− 2 , CO •− 3 , NO − 3 and CO 2− 3 ).<br />
As it is discussed, the plot of interaction energy (E int ) and vertical detachment<br />
energy (VDE) vs. number of water molecules (n) in these hydrated clusters (I •− 2 .nH 2 O)<br />
behave in a similar way. So it is interesting to test if there is any direct correlation<br />
between these two energy terms. For I •− 2 .nH 2 O clusters (n=1-8), weighted average<br />
interaction energy, E w<br />
int<br />
is related to the statistical weighted average vertical detachment<br />
energy, VDE w by a simple linear relation,<br />
E w<br />
int<br />
= -4.64 + 1.13 VDE w<br />
Where, both E w<br />
int<br />
and VDE w are expressed in eV. The best fit linear plot with the<br />
graphical data points are shown in Fig. 2.6-II(a).<br />
53