08.01.2014 Views

PDF file - Department of Health and Ageing

PDF file - Department of Health and Ageing

PDF file - Department of Health and Ageing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, 2004<br />

Annual report<br />

Cholera<br />

Case defi nition – Cholera<br />

Only confirmed cases are reported.<br />

Confirmed case: Requires isolation <strong>of</strong><br />

toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 or O139.<br />

In 2004, there were fi ve cases <strong>of</strong> cholera notifi ed in<br />

Australia, two from Victoria, <strong>and</strong> one each from New<br />

South Wales, Queensl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Western Australia.<br />

Four <strong>of</strong> these cases acquired their disease overseas:<br />

one in Indonesia, one in the Philippines, <strong>and</strong><br />

two in India. The place <strong>of</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> the fi fth case<br />

was unknown.<br />

All fi ve notifi cations were Vibrio cholerae serogroup<br />

O1. There were two El Tor biotype notifi cations <strong>and</strong><br />

two Ogawa serotypes reported. Table 11 summarises<br />

the serogroups, biotypes, serotypes <strong>and</strong> toxin<br />

producing status <strong>of</strong> these notifi cations.<br />

In 2004, there were several suspected cases <strong>of</strong><br />

SARS reported by jurisdictions. Enhanced surveillance<br />

by general practitioners <strong>and</strong> hospitals in<br />

Australia resulted in the testing <strong>of</strong> fi ve people with<br />

fever, respiratory symptoms <strong>and</strong> history <strong>of</strong> travel to<br />

China. All tests for SARS were negative.<br />

Cholera, plague, rabies, yellow fever, SARS, HPAIH<br />

<strong>and</strong> viral haemorrhagic fevers are <strong>of</strong> international<br />

public health importance <strong>and</strong> are notified to the World<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Organization. Although no local transmission<br />

had been reported in Australia, these diseases<br />

continue to occur around the world. Travellers are<br />

advised to seek information on the risk <strong>of</strong> contracting<br />

these diseases in their destinations <strong>and</strong> take appropriate<br />

measures. More information on quarantinable<br />

diseases <strong>and</strong> travel health can be found on the<br />

Australian Government <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Ageing</strong> Website at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/<br />

wcms/Publishing.nsf/Content/health-pubhlth-strategquaranti-index.htm<br />

Sexually transmissible infections<br />

In 2004, sexually transmissible infections (STIs)<br />

reported to NNDSS were chlamydial infection, donovanosis,<br />

gonococcal infections <strong>and</strong> for the first time<br />

two categories <strong>of</strong> syphilis: syphilis – infectious (primary,<br />

secondary <strong>and</strong> early latent) less than 2 years<br />

duration <strong>and</strong> syphilis – <strong>of</strong> greater than 2 years or<br />

unknown duration. The NNDSS also received reports<br />

on congenital syphilis. These conditions were notifiable<br />

in all states <strong>and</strong> territories.<br />

Other national surveillance systems that monitor<br />

STI in Australia include the Australian Gonococcal<br />

Surveillance Programme, which is a network <strong>of</strong> specialist<br />

laboratories, <strong>and</strong> the National Centre in HIV<br />

Epidemiology <strong>and</strong> Clinical Research.<br />

The national trends in the number <strong>and</strong> rates <strong>of</strong> STI<br />

notifi cations reported to the NNDSS between 2000<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2004 are shown in Table 4. In interpreting these<br />

data it is important to note that changes in notifi cations<br />

over time may not solely refl ect changes in<br />

disease prevalence. Increases in screening rates,<br />

more targeted screening, the use <strong>of</strong> more sensitive<br />

diagnostic tests, as well as periodic public awareness<br />

campaigns may contribute to changes in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> notifi cations over time.<br />

Age adjusted notifi cation rates were calculated for<br />

Indigenous <strong>and</strong> non-Indigenous populations for jurisdictions<br />

that had Indigenous status data completed<br />

in more than 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> notifi cations. These data<br />

however, have to be interpreted cautiously as STI<br />

screening occurs predominantly in specifi c high-risk<br />

groups including Indigenous populations. Similarly,<br />

rates between males <strong>and</strong> females need to be interpreted<br />

cautiously as rates <strong>of</strong> testing for STI differ<br />

between the sexes.<br />

Table 11. Cholera notifications 2004, Australia, by notifying jurisdiction <strong>and</strong> case details<br />

Notifying<br />

jurisdiction<br />

Sex<br />

Age at<br />

onset<br />

Vibrio cholerae serogroup/biotype/<br />

serotype<br />

Toxin production<br />

Country <strong>of</strong><br />

acquisition<br />

NSW Male 45 Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Unknown Philippines<br />

Qld Female 50 Vibrio cholerae O1 Unknown Unknown<br />

Vic Female 23 Vibrio cholerae O1 Ogawa Not reported India<br />

Vic Female 34 Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Ogawa Not reported India<br />

WA Male 33 Vibrio cholerae O1 Unknown Indonesia<br />

CDI Vol 30 No 1 2006 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!