24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

89 Rock failure in compression, tension and shear<br />

during the failure process in terms of the applied effective principal stresses σ 1 and σ 3 ,<br />

τ f = 0.5(σ 1 − σ 3 ) sin 2β (4.1)<br />

σ n = 0.5(σ 1 + σ 3 ) + 0.5(σ 1 − σ 3 ) cos 2β (4.2)<br />

where β is the angle between the fault normal and σ 1 (Figure 4.2a).<br />

Conducting a series of triaxial tests defines an empirical Mohr–Coulomb failure<br />

envelope that describes failure of the rock at different confining pressures (Figure 4.2b).<br />

Allowable stress states (as described by Mohr circles) are those that do not intersect the<br />

Mohr–Coulomb failure envelope. Stress states that describe a rock just at the failure<br />

point “touch” the failure envelope. Stress states corresponding to Mohr circles which<br />

exceed the failure line are not allowed because failure of the rock would have occurred<br />

prior to the rock having achieved such a stress state.<br />

The slope of the Mohr failure envelopes for most rocks decreases as confining pressure<br />

increases, as shown schematically in Figure 4.2b and for a sandstone in Figure 4.3a.<br />

However, for most rocks it is possible to consider the change of strength with confining<br />

pressure in terms of a linearized Mohr–Coulomb failure envelope (Figures 4.2c<br />

and 4.3a) defined by two parameters: µ i , the slope of the failure line, termed the coefficient<br />

of internal friction, and the unconfined compressive strength (termed the UCS<br />

or C 0 ). One could also describe the linear Mohr failure line in terms of its intercept<br />

when σ 3 = 0 which is called the cohesive strength (or cohesion), S 0 ,asiscommon in<br />

soil mechanics. In this case, the linearized Mohr failure line can be written as<br />

τ = S 0 + σ n µ i (4.3)<br />

As cohesion is not a physically measurable parameter, it is more common to express<br />

rock strength in terms of C 0 . The relationship between S 0 and C 0 is:<br />

C 0 = 2S 0<br />

[ (µ<br />

2<br />

i + 1 ) 1/2<br />

+ µi<br />

]<br />

(4.4)<br />

While uniaxial tests are obviously the easiest way to measure C 0 ,itispreferable to<br />

determine C 0 by conducting a series of triaxial tests to avoid the axial splitting of the<br />

samples that frequently occurs during uniaxial tests and the test results are sensitive<br />

to the presence of pre-existing flaws in the samples. Once a Mohr envelope has been<br />

obtained through a series of tests, one can find C 0 by either fitting the envelope with a<br />

linear Mohr failure line and determining the uniaxial compressive strength graphically,<br />

or simply by measuring strength at many pressures and plotting the data as shown<br />

in Figure 4.3b, for Darley Dale sandstone (after Murrell 1965). As shown, C 0 is the<br />

intercept in the resultant plot (94.3 MPa) and µ i is found to be 0.83 from the relationship<br />

µ i = n − 1<br />

2 √ n<br />

(4.5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!