24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

159 Faults and fractures at depth<br />

For simplicity, let us consider right-lateral slip on a vertical, east–west trending strike<br />

slip fault at the surface of a half-space (Figure 5.11a). When the fault slips, P-waves<br />

radiate outward with both positive and negative polarities that map onto symmetric<br />

compressional and dilatational quadrants. The four lobes shown in the figure illustrate<br />

the variation of wave amplitude with the direction of wave propagation relative to the<br />

fault plane. Note that the P-wave amplitude is zero in the direction parallel and perpendicular<br />

to the fault plane, such that these planes are referred to as nodal planes. If<br />

there were seismometers distributed over the surface of this half space, the orientation<br />

of the two nodal planes and the sense of motion on the planes could be determined<br />

by mapping the polarity of the first arriving waves from the earthquake. Thus, in the<br />

idealized case shown, data from a number of seismometers distributed on the surface<br />

of the half space could be used to determine both the orientation of the fault plane and<br />

the fact that right-lateral slip occurred on this plane. There is, however, a 90 ◦ ambiguity<br />

in the orientation of the fault plane as left-lateral slip on a north–south trending fault<br />

plane would produce exactly the same pattern of seismic radiation as right lateral slip on<br />

an east–west striking plane. Thus, an earthquake focal plane mechanism contains two<br />

orthogonal nodal planes, one of which is the fault plane and the other is referred to as<br />

the auxiliary plane. In the absence of additional data (such as coincidence of the earthquake<br />

hypocenter with the location of a mapped fault or the alignment of aftershocks<br />

along the fault surface), it cannot be determined which of the two planes is the actual<br />

fault.<br />

Actual earthquakes are more complicated in several regards. First, they usually occur<br />

at depth such that seismic radiation propagates outward in all directions; it also quite<br />

common for faults to be dipping and, of course, strike-slip, reverse or normal fault slip<br />

(or a combination of strike-slip with normal or strike-slip with reverse) could occur.<br />

Figure 5.11b isacross-section illustrating the radiation pattern for a dipping normal<br />

fault. By constructing an imaginary sphere around the hypocenter, we can portray<br />

the radiation pattern on a lower-hemisphere stereographic projection (Figure 5.11c),<br />

producing figures that look like beach balls where the compressional quadrants are<br />

shaded dark and the dilatational quadrants are shown in white. Thus, for the case<br />

illustrated in Figure 5.11c, we know from the dilatational arrivals in the center of the<br />

figure that it was a normal faulting event. By definition, the P-axis bisects the dilatational<br />

quadrant, the T-axis bisects the compressional quadrant and B-axis is orthogonal to<br />

P and T. Inthis simple case, the orientation of the two nodal planes trend north–<br />

south but knowing that the east dipping plane is the fault plane requires additional<br />

information, as noted above. Of course, if the seismic waves are recorded on relatively<br />

few seismographs, the planes of the focal mechanism will be poorly constrained, as will<br />

the P- and T-axes. Nonetheless, as discussed in more detail in Chapter 9 (and illustrated<br />

in the stress maps presented in Chapter 1), earthquake focal plane mechanisms prove<br />

useful for determining both the style of faulting and approximate directions of the<br />

principal stresses (see below).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!