24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

.<br />

140<br />

a.<br />

120<br />

100<br />

S hmin<br />

S Hmax<br />

R<br />

S hmin<br />

0<br />

s θθ<br />

(MPa)<br />

S Hmax<br />

50 100 150<br />

s θθ (MPa) s θθ (MPa)<br />

c.<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

20 MPa<br />

1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5<br />

Normalized radial distance<br />

58.5 MPa<br />

1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5<br />

Normalized radial distance<br />

Figure 6.2. (a) Variation of effective hoop stress, σ θθ around a vertical well of radius R subject to an east–west acting S Hmax . Note that σ θθ varies strongly<br />

with both position around the wellbore and distance from the wellbore wall. Values of stress and pore pressure used for the calculations are described in the<br />

text. (b) Variation of σ θθ with normalized distance, r/R, from the wellbore wall at the point of maximum horizontal compression around the wellbore (i.e. at<br />

the azimuth of S hmin ). At the wellbore wall, σ θθ is strongly amplified above the values of S Hmax and S hmin in accordance with equation (6.2). At r/R = 1.5, the<br />

hoop stress is approximately 30% greater than the effective far-field stress σ Hmax that would be present at that position in the absence of the well. (c) Variation<br />

of σ θθ with normalized distance, r/R, from the wellbore wall at the azimuth of S Hmax , the point of minimum horizontal compression around the wellbore. At<br />

the wellbore wall, σ θθ is close to zero. At r/R = 1.5, the hoop stress is slightly greater than the effective far-field stress σ hmin that would be present at that<br />

position in the absence of the well.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!