24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 Reservoir geomechanics<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Stress (MPa)<br />

20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

1000<br />

S hmin (LOT)<br />

Pore Pressure (RFT)<br />

Depth (mRKB TVD)<br />

2000<br />

3000<br />

4000<br />

HYDROSTATIC<br />

PORE PRESSURE<br />

S v<br />

5000<br />

Figure 7.4. Least principal stress as a function of depth determined from extended leak off tests in<br />

the Visund field (after Wiprut, Zoback et al. 2000). The least principal stress is slightly below the<br />

overburden stress (determined from integration of density logs). The pore pressure is somewhat<br />

above hydrostatic (shown by the dashed line for reference). Reprinted with permission of Elsevier.<br />

to about 1500 m depth (not shown) but at ∼3000 m it is approximately 75% of the<br />

vertical stress. There are three important features to note about the least principal stress<br />

values at depth. First, the measurements are repeatable and indicate a consistent trend<br />

throughout the field. Second, the measurements clearly indicate a compressional stress<br />

state because even at relatively shallow depth (where pore pressure is hydrostatic), the<br />

magnitude of the least principal stress is extremely close to the vertical stress. We show<br />

below that the magnitude of S Hmax is greater than S v such that a strike-slip faulting regime<br />

exists in this region. However, because S hmin is extremely close to S v if the magnitude<br />

of S v was slightly over-estimated (due to uncertainties in density), or if S 3 is slightly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!