24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

345 Critically stressed faults and fluid flow<br />

feldspars to clays cause faults (and the secondary fractures and faults in the damage<br />

zones adjacent to them) to seal over time. Mechanical processes associated with active<br />

faulting such as brecciation counteract these tendencies and help maintain permeability<br />

within the faults and in the damage zones adjacent to them. Townend and Zoback (2000)<br />

argue that it is the presence of critically stressed faults deep within the brittle crust that<br />

keeps the bulk permeability of the crust about four orders of magnitude greater than<br />

intact rock samples subjected to appropriate confining pressures.<br />

It is well known that laboratory studies show that the permeability of faults and<br />

fractures is a strong function of effective normal stress (Kranz, Frankel et al. 1979;<br />

Brace 1980; Brown and Scholz 1985). The data shown in Figure 11.3 would seem to<br />

contradict this as the tendency for faults to be permeable appears to be independent<br />

of normal stress. However, while the critically-stressed-fault hypothesis may help us<br />

understand which faults are likely to be permeable, a number of other factors determine<br />

what the actual permeability is likely to be. For example, for a given permeable fault,<br />

a number of geologic factors control its permeability such as the degree of alteration<br />

and cementation of the brecciated rock within the fracture and its diagenetic history<br />

(Fisher and Knipe 1998; Fisher, Casey et al. 2003), as well as the current effective<br />

normal stress.<br />

It is probably useful to discuss briefly why the critically-stressed-fault hypothesis<br />

works, and what might be its extent of usefulness (some of which will be discussed<br />

below in the context of specific case studies). In the context of the critically-stressedfault<br />

hypothesis, the increase in permeability associated with critically stressed faults<br />

results from brecciation during shearing (Figure 5.2) and formation of a damage zone<br />

adjacent to the faults (e.g. Chester and Logan 1986; Antonellini and Aydin 1994;<br />

Davatzes and Aydin 2003, and many others). In formations like the diagenetically<br />

immature shales of the Gulf of Mexico (the so-called gumbo shales) or diagenetically<br />

immature siliceous rocks in which silica is in the form of Opal A (a form of SiO 2<br />

that deforms ductily), shearing would not cause brecciation so slip on active faults<br />

may not contribute significantly to formation permeability. The effects of fractures and<br />

faults in both of these lithologies are discussed in case studies below. In carbonates,<br />

both dissolution and precipitation influence permeability, but there still might be an<br />

important role for faulting to contribute to permeability. For example, faulting and<br />

brecciation may occur along planes originally formed through dissolution processes<br />

and there is no reason to reject out-of-hand the critically-stressed-fault hypothesis for<br />

carbonate rocks. The importance of brittle faulting in contributing to bulk permeability<br />

in chalk <strong>reservoir</strong>s of the North Sea is discussed in Chapter 12.<br />

Another geologic setting in which critically stressed faults may not directly contribute<br />

significantly to formation permeability is in the case of porous, poorly cemented sandstones<br />

and diatomites. In such lithologies, either compaction bands, planes of reduced<br />

porosity but little shearing (see Mollema and Antonellini 1996 and Sternlof, Rudnicki<br />

et al. 2005), or shear bands, planar bands of reduced porosity that form in association

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!