24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

324 Reservoir geomechanics<br />

and S hmin .Asimilar problem occurs when drilling through a highly depleted sand in<br />

order to reach a deeper horizon because of the decrease in the magnitude of the least<br />

principal stress accompanying depletion (see Chapter 12).<br />

In this section, we follow Ito, Zoback et al. (2001) and address the theoretical possibility<br />

of drilling with mud weights in excess of the least principal stress for cases<br />

of particularly high pore pressure (or high minimum mud weights needed to maintain<br />

wellbore instability). In fact, there is empirical evidence that this can occur. The<br />

following was reported by a major oil company drilling in the Gulf of Mexico:<br />

While drilling a highly deviated well at elevated pore pressure, lost circulation occurred at an ECD<br />

of 14.8 ppg caused by a pressure surge while attempting to free a stuck logging tool. The measured<br />

value of the least principal stress at this depth was 13.0 ppg. Lost circulation material (LCM) was<br />

used to establish circulation at 14.9 ppg (1.9 ppg over the least principal stress). Once circulation<br />

was re-established, the well drilled to TD with an ECD of ∼14 ppg (1 ppg above the measured least<br />

principal stress).<br />

We will return to this anecdotal account and offer one explanations of why it was<br />

possible to re-establish circulation and continue drilling with mud weights greater than<br />

the least principal stress.<br />

We consider three critical wellbore pressures, p frac , p link and p grow .For the general<br />

case of a well that is deviated with respect to the in situ stress field (discussed in Chapter<br />

8), tensile fractures initiate at the wellbore wall at a pressure we will call p frac .Asthese<br />

fractures grow away from the wellbore wall they will attempt to turn to be perpendicular<br />

to the least principal stress and link up at p link . Once the fractures have linked up and<br />

turned to be perpendicular to the least principal stress, they propagate away from<br />

the wellbore at p grow .Itisobvious that lost circulation cannot occur if the wellbore<br />

pressure during drilling is below p frac .However,evenifp frac is exceeded and tensile<br />

fractures initiate at the wellbore wall, fracture propagation (and hence lost circulation)<br />

will be limited as long as the wellbore pressure is below p link , the pressure required<br />

for multiple tensile fractures to link up around the wellbore. Finally, if the wellbore<br />

pressure is greater than p link , the fractures will not grow away from the wellbore (and<br />

significant lost circulation will not occur) if the wellbore pressure is below p grow , which<br />

must exceed (if only slightly) the least principal stress. In general, our modeling shows<br />

that p frac and p link can be maximized by drilling the wellbore in an optimal orientation,<br />

and p grow can be maximized by using “non-invading” drilling muds that prevent fluid<br />

pressure from reaching the fracture tip.<br />

First, let us consider p grow , the fluid pressure in the fracture necessary to cause fracture<br />

propagation once it has already propagated away from the wellbore. For simplicity, the<br />

fracture is modeled as a penny shaped fracture oriented normal to S 3 . The pressure<br />

distribution in the fracture is assumed be uniform, as shown in Figure 10.16, which<br />

means that if there is a significant pressure gradient in the fracture, we will be calculating<br />

alower bound value of p grow .However, we must take into account the fact that drilling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!