24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

258 Reservoir geomechanics<br />

a. b.<br />

S Hmax Stress from shear velocity anisotrpy<br />

S Hmax Stress from wellbore failure<br />

Figure 8.15. Stress maps of an oil field in Southeast Asia determined from (a) analysis of fast shear<br />

wave polarizations in dipole sonic logs in vertical wellbores and (b) breakouts detected in electrical<br />

image data.<br />

Sinha, Norris et al.(1994) and Boness and Zoback (2006) modeled elastic wave propagation<br />

in a borehole with an axis at a range of angles to the formation symmetry axis.<br />

They demonstrated how the amount of anisotropy varies as the borehole becomes more<br />

oblique to the symmetry axis of the formation and that the maximum anisotropy is<br />

recorded at a 90 ◦ angle.<br />

The geometry of the borehole relative to the formation will not only dictate the<br />

amount of anisotropy observed but also the apparent fast direction that is recorded by<br />

the tool. In the case of an arbitrarily deviated wellbore, it is probable that the borehole<br />

will be at some oblique angle to the symmetry axis (Figure 8.16a) and more generally,<br />

that neither the borehole nor the formation will be aligned with the cartesian coordinate<br />

axes (Figure 8.16b).<br />

A case history that illustrates the controls on shear wave velocity anisotropy in a<br />

highly deviated well is that of the dipole sonic logs obtained in the SAFOD (San<br />

Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth) boreholes between measured depths of 600 m<br />

and 3000 m (Boness and Zoback 2006). Two boreholes were drilled at the SAFOD site,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!