24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

410 Reservoir geomechanics<br />

Figure 12.15. Cumulative production from a hypothetical <strong>reservoir</strong> with a single well. One<br />

simulation represents compaction using constant compressibility throughout production. When<br />

compaction drive (porosity loss due to depletion) is considered, the cumulative production from<br />

this <strong>reservoir</strong> is increased significantly. However, the loss in permeability associated with a loss in<br />

porosity reduces the <strong>reservoir</strong> productivity to some degree, depending on the severity of<br />

compaction-induced permeability loss.<br />

permeability (upper bound) on the estimated recovery. The trade-off between porosity<br />

changes and permeability changes has significant implications for the determination of<br />

the recovery rate and the overall exploitation scheme for the <strong>reservoir</strong> and will affect<br />

critical decisions such as the need to drill additional wells.<br />

Viscoplastic deformation and dynamic DARS<br />

One of the limitations of traditional end-cap models, such as the modified Cam-Clay<br />

described in the previous section, isthat the models only describe materials with a<br />

static, time-independent yield surface. For materials with significant time-dependent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!