24.01.2014 Views

reservoir geomecanics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

417 Effects of <strong>reservoir</strong> depletion<br />

Figure 12.19. Cumulative subsidence and horizontal displacement calculated from superposition of<br />

many disk-shaped <strong>reservoir</strong>s in the Lapeyrouse field using the solution (Geertsma 1973) and DARS<br />

(with a viscoplastic rheology) for calculating the total <strong>reservoir</strong> compaction (after Chan and Zoback<br />

2006). The predicted displacement U X , U Y and U Z are measured in cm. The predicted subsidence<br />

(d) is comparable to the measured elevation change from the leveling survey (red line) in the middle<br />

of the field but underpredicts the apparent subsidence at north end of the field near benchmark M.<br />

However, the <strong>reservoir</strong>s are relatively deep (∼4.5 km) and thin (individual sands are<br />

∼10 m thick), but as many as five <strong>reservoir</strong>s (ranging in diameter from ∼1 to2.5 km)<br />

are stacked upon each other in some places. Hence, D/R is quite large (ranging from<br />

about 3 to 9) and the subsidence and surface displacements are expected to be small<br />

despite the appreciable depletion. As shown in Figure 12.19, about 12 cm of subsidence<br />

is expected over the center of the <strong>reservoir</strong> and horizontal surface displacements are as<br />

much as 5 cm near the edges of the field.<br />

Figure 12.19d compares the predicted cumulative subsidence from all <strong>reservoir</strong>s<br />

(modeled as individual circular <strong>reservoir</strong>s of constant thickness) with that measured

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!