03.02.2014 Views

Medianet Reference Guide - Cisco

Medianet Reference Guide - Cisco

Medianet Reference Guide - Cisco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6<br />

<strong>Medianet</strong> Management and Visibility Design Considerations<br />

Network-Embedded Management Functionality<br />

This example is not the only recommended model for enabling NetFlow within an enterprise medianet,<br />

but is an example of a methodology for collecting NetFlow data to gain some useful insight regarding<br />

video flows at various points within the network infrastructure. You can choose to selectively enable<br />

NetFlow collection at one or more strategic aggregation points in the network, such as the distribution<br />

layer within different modules of a campus, depending on the desired visibility for video flows. For<br />

example, NetFlow statistics can be collected at the ingress interfaces of the distribution layer switch<br />

pairs at each module within a campus. In other words, statistics can be collected for traffic flows exiting<br />

the core and entering each campus module. Statistics gathered from this type of NetFlow deployment<br />

can be used to determine the following video traffic flows:<br />

• Aggregated flows outbound across the corporate WAN to all the branch locations<br />

• Flows into each building within the campus<br />

• Aggregated flows outbound toward the Internet<br />

This model can be useful because many video flows emanate from a central point within a campus data<br />

center or campus service module, and flow out to users within each campus building or each branch<br />

location. For example, unicast or broadcast enterprise TV as well as video-on-demand (VoD) flows to<br />

desktop devices often follow this flow pattern. Likewise, because of the nature of TelePresence video,<br />

the majority of the video flows within a multipoint meeting are from a centralized <strong>Cisco</strong> TelePresence<br />

Multipoint Switch, potentially located within a data center or campus service module, out to the<br />

<strong>Cisco</strong> TelePresence System endpoints located within the campus buildings and branch locations.<br />

Additional flow information can be gathered by implementing NetFlow bidirectionally at the distribution<br />

layer of each module. Note that this can preferably be done by enabling NetFlow statistics collection in<br />

an ingress direction on other interfaces. Although video broadcasts, VoD, and multipoint TelePresence<br />

tend to follow a flow model where the majority of traffic emanates from a central point outward to the<br />

endpoints, <strong>Cisco</strong> IP video surveillance follows the opposite model. The majority of traffic in a <strong>Cisco</strong> IP<br />

video surveillance deployment flows from cameras deployed within the campus buildings back to the<br />

Video Surveillance Operations Manager (VSOM) server potentially deployed within a data center or<br />

campus service module. However, note that implementing NetFlow collection bidirectionally can result<br />

in some duplication of flow information when multiple collection points exist within the network<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Additional flow information can also be gathered by implementing NetFlow at the branch router itself,<br />

to gain insight into the flows into and out of individual branch locations, if that level of detail is needed.<br />

Keep in mind, however, that the NetFlow data export uses some of the available branch bandwidth. Also,<br />

NetFlow in <strong>Cisco</strong> IOS router platforms is performed in software, potentially resulting in somewhat<br />

higher CPU utilization depending on the platform and the amount of flow statistics collected and<br />

exported. The use of flow filters and/or sampling may be necessary to decrease both CPU utilization and<br />

bandwidth usage because of NetFlow flow record exports. Even with the campus distribution switches,<br />

it may be desirable to implement flow filters and/or sampling to decrease CPU and bandwidth usage.<br />

Note that data sampling may distort statistics regarding how much traffic is flowing across a single point<br />

in the network. However, the relative percentages of the flows can still be useful from a bandwidth<br />

allocation perspective. An alternative strategy may be to SPAN the flow traffic from the <strong>Cisco</strong> Catalyst<br />

switch to a separate device, such as the <strong>Cisco</strong> Service Control Engine (SCE), which can then perform<br />

analysis of the flows and export records to a centralized NetFlow collector for monitoring and reporting.<br />

NetFlow Collector Considerations<br />

The aggregation capabilities of the NetFlow collector determine to a large extent the usefulness of the<br />

NetFlow data from a medianet perspective. Most NetFlow collectors provide monitoring and historical<br />

reporting of aggregate bit rates, byte counts, and packet counts of overall IP data. Typically, this can be<br />

further divided into TCP, UDP, and other IP protocols, such as Internet Control Message Protocol<br />

(ICMP). However, beyond this level of analysis, some NetFlow collectors simply report Real-Time<br />

OL-22201-01<br />

<strong>Medianet</strong> <strong>Reference</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

6-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!