MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bibliography 99<br />
Abstract: This paper examines the performance of the National Rural Employment Guarantee programme since its launch in<br />
mid-2005. It provides a summary of progress in certain areas and also highlights specific weaknesses. Finally, it describes the<br />
challenges that lie ahead and suggests how these can be overcome.<br />
Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD), ‘Guidelines for Convergence: Leveraging NREGA for Sustainable Development<br />
through Inter-sectoral Convergence, 2009–10’, MoRD.<br />
Abstract: <strong>MGNREGA</strong> with its inter-sectoral approach opens up opportunities for convergence with different programmes.<br />
The aim of convergence is to optimise public investments made under existing Schemes through suggested ways of linking and<br />
steering them towards a common/shared recipient—both physical (area, infrastructure, natural resource) and human (person,<br />
group, agency). To set pace and pilot convergence efforts, the <strong>MGNREGA</strong> formulated Convergence Guidelines in 2010 and<br />
signed Memoranda of Understanding with the Ministry of Agriculture (ICAR), Ministry of Environment and Forests, Ministry<br />
of Water Resources, the Pradan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna (PMGSY) and Schemes for land resource management.<br />
Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD), ‘Recommendations of the Working Group on Individual Land and List of<br />
Permissible Works’, Report submitted to the MoRD, 2010.<br />
Abstract: The Ministry of Rural Development set up a committee to research the coverage, quality and support given to<br />
individual works in detail at the GP and at individual and social group levels; many works taken up thus far, are not complete<br />
or not fructuous. The Committee was also to analyse the impact of MGNREGS on agricultural productivity.<br />
The Committee put forth several recommendations, some of these were: Interventions must be specific and based on land<br />
types, soil conditions and monsoon behaviour. Lands belonging to the poor are poor in quality and enhancing it calls for<br />
substantial well-planned measures and spiralling activities that are spread over time; MGNREGS must shift from physical land<br />
development to land husbandry; unless the GS has a say in works and its implementation, investments will have little scope<br />
of being an asset. The key in works on individual lands is to understand and plan on the basis of its specificities along with<br />
incorporating farmers ideas.<br />
Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD), ‘Report of the Committee on Revision of <strong>MGNREGA</strong> Operational Guidelines’,<br />
Report submitted to the MoRD, New Delhi: Government of India, 2012.<br />
Abstract: A committee was set up under the chairmanship of Dr Mihir Shah, Member, Planning Commission to examine ways<br />
in which the Operational Guidelines of <strong>MGNREGA</strong> could be revised to address concerns to: (i) Expand the list of permissible<br />
works under <strong>MGNREGA</strong> in order to strengthen the synergy between <strong>MGNREGA</strong> and rural livelihoods, respond to the<br />
demands of the States for greater location-specific flexibility in permissible works, help improve the ecological balance in rural<br />
India and provide a cleaner, healthier environment to its people; (ii) suggest procedural changes that would help strengthen the<br />
demand-driven character of <strong>MGNREGA</strong>, which is its real differentia specifica; (iii) strengthen the participatory planning and<br />
implementation process under <strong>MGNREGA</strong>, so that the programme results in the creation of durable assets and an increase in<br />
farm productivity; (iv) make changes that would infuse the programme with greater efficiency and help overcome the major<br />
complaints under the programme such as delays in payments of wages and, (v) develop effective mechanisms for eliminating<br />
the scope of corruption under the programme.<br />
Mistry, P., and A. Jaswal, ‘Study on the Implementation of NREGS: Focus on Migration’, Ahmedabad: DISHA, 2009.<br />
Abstract: The paper presents findings from a study involving 938 respondents that comprise beneficiaries of the NREGS across<br />
four states and 12 districts. In addition to aspects such as scheme implementation and benefits from NREGS, the authors<br />
highlight the effect on migration across the four states.<br />
Mukherjee, D., and U. B. Sinha, ‘Understanding NREGA: A Simple Theory and Some Facts’, Centre for Development<br />
Economics, Delhi: Delhi School of Economics, 2011.<br />
Abstract: In this paper, using a simple theoretical model, the authors have analysed the impact of the NREGA scheme on (i)<br />
the rural labour market, (ii) income of the poor households and (iii) overall agricultural production. It is seen that the income<br />
from NREGA alone can be a substantial part of the target income of the poor. The authors show that in such a situation, the<br />
poor may exhibit a backward bending supply curve of labour which may lead to an aggregate reduction in agricultural output.