12.02.2014 Views

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

102 Bibliography<br />

Planning Commission, All India Report on Evaluation of NREGA: A Survey of Twenty Districts, Programme Evaluation<br />

Office, Delhi: Institute of Applied Management Research and Planning Commission, Government of India, 2010.<br />

Abstract: This survey shows that due to the income generation through this scheme, the number of beneficiaries at the low<br />

earning level are reduced to nearly half in size resulting in the rise of households with marginally higher income. It was<br />

found that more than half of the beneficiaries are agricultural and unskilled workers. There is also a shift in the beneficiaries<br />

expenditure pattern on food and non-food items. Seventy per cent of the beneficiaries revealed that the migration is only for<br />

just wages and not for any better wages.<br />

PRADAN, Implementing Integrated Natural Resouce Management Projects under NREGA: A Resource Book, Manual<br />

prepared for the Ministry of Rural Development/UNDP, Delhi: PRADAN, 2009.<br />

Abstract: PRADAN has demonstrated ways to promote the development of natural resources leading to equitable and<br />

sustainable economic growth, ensuring household food security and eliminating mass poverty in the region. Such an approach<br />

requires participatory planning at the level of hamlets and villages, to develop production and management systems suitable<br />

to the resource endowment to meet people’s needs and preferences. The technologies that PRADAN has evolved are simple,<br />

labour intensive and, therefore, suited to the requirements of NREGA in order to generate wage employment opportunities<br />

while creating livelihood assets.<br />

Ravallion, M., ‘Corruption in the MGNREGS: Assessing an Index’, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 47, no. 8, 25 February<br />

2012.<br />

Abstract: There is corruption in the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, no question about<br />

that. But simple indices that claim to measure corruption and make an assessment of interstate levels of corruption can end<br />

up offering us a wrong understanding.<br />

Roy, A., and N. Dey, ‘The Wages of Discontent’, in The Battle for Employment Guarantee, ed. R. Khera, New Delhi: Oxford<br />

University Press, 2011, pp. 261–65.<br />

Abstract: The chapter discusses the delinking of <strong>MGNREGA</strong> wages from Section 6(1) of the <strong>MGNREGA</strong>.<br />

SAMARTHAN, ‘Impact Assessment of <strong>MGNREGA</strong> in Madhya Pradesh’, Submitted to Poverty Monitoring and Policy<br />

Support Unit (PMPSU), Madhya Pradesh: State Planning Commission, 2010.<br />

Abstract: The study was conducted in 16 districts in Madhya Pradesh. The study sample was split across different geographical<br />

areas, phases of implementation, their performance on employment generation and also different categories of households. The<br />

findings in the report are broadly divided in 5 sections, ‘Access of MGNREGS’, ‘Knowledge of and Attitude Towards the Scheme’,<br />

‘Provisions and Practice Related Issues’, ‘Transparency and Accountability Related Issues’ and ‘Impact of the Scheme’. Some of<br />

the key findings of the report include, low awareness levels among beneficiaries, no clear strategy for maintenance of assets and<br />

funds to be used for maintenance and social audits not being conducted. In the cases where social audits were conducted the<br />

issues of less wage payment (69 per cent), quality and use of work (75.5 per cent), work demands (75.5 per cent) have figured<br />

prominently. On the positive side, the largest proportion of estimated benefited households spend their <strong>MGNREGA</strong> income on<br />

food, medicine, and clothes for the family members, i.e. 81 per cent, 55 per cent, 41 per cent respectively.<br />

Samaj Pragati Sahayog, and Megh Pyne Abhiyan, Leveraging <strong>MGNREGA</strong> for Flood Control in Bihar: A Case for Policy<br />

Reform in Bihar, 2011.<br />

Abstract: Based on intensive surveys and interactions with village communities spread over two years, the study has come up<br />

with an action plan which suggests that an outlay of Rs 4 crore in the selected panchayats could generate more than 2 lakh<br />

person-days of employment, and effectively help in controlling floods across nearly 9,000 hectares of land. Through extending<br />

such measure across all 39 flood-prone districts of the State of Bihar, it would be possible to effectively protect about 1.5 crore<br />

people of the State from the ravages of floods.<br />

Sankaran, K. ‘NREGA Wages: Ensuring Decent Work’, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 46, no. 07, 12 February.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!