12.02.2014 Views

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60 <strong>MGNREGA</strong> Sameeksha<br />

reasons for denial. What is clear is that so long as the<br />

states do not have mechanisms to accurately record<br />

demand for work, such a discrepancy can always<br />

arise. Recent steps (described in Chapter 7) attempt<br />

to address precisely this lacuna.<br />

Issue of Dated Receipts and Non-provision of<br />

Work within 15 Days<br />

Under the Act, every household that applies for work<br />

is to be issued a dated receipt. This receipt becomes<br />

the instrument for ensuring the household gets work<br />

within 15 days from the date they desire work to be<br />

provided. Thus, provision of timely work is vital to<br />

ensuring social security to the poorest. However,<br />

findings from the field suggest that this is not always<br />

the case. The CAG audit found that dated receipts<br />

of applications were not given in 282 GPs across<br />

21 states. 26<br />

A study across four districts of Kerala found that, of<br />

the 620 total respondents seeking employment, only<br />

57 per cent got dated receipts while around 71 per<br />

cent got work within the prescribed period. Studies<br />

from other states have similar findings suggesting<br />

that dated receipts are often not issued. 27 In Odisha,<br />

in a study of 162 JC holders and 96 non-JC holder<br />

households across four districts, it was observed that<br />

the average waiting time was 31 days for getting work<br />

after application. 28 In Uttar Pradesh, 58 per cent of<br />

400 sample beneficiaries across five districts were<br />

provided work within 15 days. 29<br />

Like, rationing, it is difficult to verify whether<br />

a household has been issued a dated receipt since<br />

application for work can also be made orally (as well<br />

as in written form).<br />

Unemployment Allowance<br />

If an applicant for employment under the Scheme is<br />

not provided employment within 15 days of receipt<br />

of his application or from the date on which the<br />

employment has been sought, he/she is entitled to<br />

a daily unemployment allowance. The CAG Audit<br />

found that unemployment allowance was not paid in<br />

58 of the surveyed blocks across 17 states, including<br />

Assam, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Odisha,<br />

Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. 30<br />

In a study in Kerala, it was found that out of 620<br />

respondents, around 30 per cent did not get work<br />

within the prescribed 15 days; however, only 4 per<br />

cent of them got unemployment allowance. 31<br />

One of the main reasons for non-provision of<br />

dated receipts is the legal requirement for payment of<br />

unemployment allowance as mandated by the Act, in<br />

case employment is not provided by the state within 15<br />

days. Further, the fact that unemployment allowance<br />

is to be paid by State Governments appears to act as a<br />

disincentive for them to provide dated receipts. Thus,<br />

the situation is one where work provided is assumed<br />

to be by definition identical to work demanded.<br />

MIS monitors both delays in provision of employment<br />

and payment of unemployment allowance.<br />

Reminders in the form of alerts for each district are<br />

provided online for speedy redressal and payment.<br />

In <strong>MGNREGA</strong> 2.0, it is proposed that the delays in<br />

provision of unemployment allowance or payment<br />

will be tracked at each stage (on a responsibility<br />

chart) on MIS (see Chapter 7).<br />

Timely and Full Payment of Wages<br />

Reports from the field suggest that wage<br />

payments are often less than the notified<br />

wage, primarily due to inaccurate Schedule<br />

of Rates, 32 and delays in payment due to<br />

inadequate staff and other institutional<br />

26<br />

CAG, Performance Audit Report No. 11, 2008.<br />

27<br />

Gandhigram University, ‘A Study on Performance of NREGS in Kerala’, Report submitted to the Ministry of Rural<br />

Development/UNDP, 2009.<br />

28<br />

Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur (IIT-K), ‘Appraisal of Processes and Procedures of NREGS in Odisha: A<br />

Study of Balasore and Mayurbhanj Districts’, Report submitted to Ministry of Rural Development/UNDP, Kharagpur: Indian<br />

Institute of Technology, 2009.<br />

29<br />

Ibid.<br />

30<br />

CAG, Performance Audit Report No. 11, 2008.<br />

31<br />

Gandhigram University, ‘A Study of Peformance of NREGS in Kerala’.<br />

32<br />

The details of the productivity norms are listed in the Schedule of Rates (SoRs). The SoRs are calculated through Work Time<br />

and Motion Studies. The SoRs, under the Act, have to be such that an average person working for 9 hours, with one hour of rest,<br />

is able to earn the notified <strong>MGNREGA</strong> minimum wage.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!