MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
60 <strong>MGNREGA</strong> Sameeksha<br />
reasons for denial. What is clear is that so long as the<br />
states do not have mechanisms to accurately record<br />
demand for work, such a discrepancy can always<br />
arise. Recent steps (described in Chapter 7) attempt<br />
to address precisely this lacuna.<br />
Issue of Dated Receipts and Non-provision of<br />
Work within 15 Days<br />
Under the Act, every household that applies for work<br />
is to be issued a dated receipt. This receipt becomes<br />
the instrument for ensuring the household gets work<br />
within 15 days from the date they desire work to be<br />
provided. Thus, provision of timely work is vital to<br />
ensuring social security to the poorest. However,<br />
findings from the field suggest that this is not always<br />
the case. The CAG audit found that dated receipts<br />
of applications were not given in 282 GPs across<br />
21 states. 26<br />
A study across four districts of Kerala found that, of<br />
the 620 total respondents seeking employment, only<br />
57 per cent got dated receipts while around 71 per<br />
cent got work within the prescribed period. Studies<br />
from other states have similar findings suggesting<br />
that dated receipts are often not issued. 27 In Odisha,<br />
in a study of 162 JC holders and 96 non-JC holder<br />
households across four districts, it was observed that<br />
the average waiting time was 31 days for getting work<br />
after application. 28 In Uttar Pradesh, 58 per cent of<br />
400 sample beneficiaries across five districts were<br />
provided work within 15 days. 29<br />
Like, rationing, it is difficult to verify whether<br />
a household has been issued a dated receipt since<br />
application for work can also be made orally (as well<br />
as in written form).<br />
Unemployment Allowance<br />
If an applicant for employment under the Scheme is<br />
not provided employment within 15 days of receipt<br />
of his application or from the date on which the<br />
employment has been sought, he/she is entitled to<br />
a daily unemployment allowance. The CAG Audit<br />
found that unemployment allowance was not paid in<br />
58 of the surveyed blocks across 17 states, including<br />
Assam, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Odisha,<br />
Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. 30<br />
In a study in Kerala, it was found that out of 620<br />
respondents, around 30 per cent did not get work<br />
within the prescribed 15 days; however, only 4 per<br />
cent of them got unemployment allowance. 31<br />
One of the main reasons for non-provision of<br />
dated receipts is the legal requirement for payment of<br />
unemployment allowance as mandated by the Act, in<br />
case employment is not provided by the state within 15<br />
days. Further, the fact that unemployment allowance<br />
is to be paid by State Governments appears to act as a<br />
disincentive for them to provide dated receipts. Thus,<br />
the situation is one where work provided is assumed<br />
to be by definition identical to work demanded.<br />
MIS monitors both delays in provision of employment<br />
and payment of unemployment allowance.<br />
Reminders in the form of alerts for each district are<br />
provided online for speedy redressal and payment.<br />
In <strong>MGNREGA</strong> 2.0, it is proposed that the delays in<br />
provision of unemployment allowance or payment<br />
will be tracked at each stage (on a responsibility<br />
chart) on MIS (see Chapter 7).<br />
Timely and Full Payment of Wages<br />
Reports from the field suggest that wage<br />
payments are often less than the notified<br />
wage, primarily due to inaccurate Schedule<br />
of Rates, 32 and delays in payment due to<br />
inadequate staff and other institutional<br />
26<br />
CAG, Performance Audit Report No. 11, 2008.<br />
27<br />
Gandhigram University, ‘A Study on Performance of NREGS in Kerala’, Report submitted to the Ministry of Rural<br />
Development/UNDP, 2009.<br />
28<br />
Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur (IIT-K), ‘Appraisal of Processes and Procedures of NREGS in Odisha: A<br />
Study of Balasore and Mayurbhanj Districts’, Report submitted to Ministry of Rural Development/UNDP, Kharagpur: Indian<br />
Institute of Technology, 2009.<br />
29<br />
Ibid.<br />
30<br />
CAG, Performance Audit Report No. 11, 2008.<br />
31<br />
Gandhigram University, ‘A Study of Peformance of NREGS in Kerala’.<br />
32<br />
The details of the productivity norms are listed in the Schedule of Rates (SoRs). The SoRs are calculated through Work Time<br />
and Motion Studies. The SoRs, under the Act, have to be such that an average person working for 9 hours, with one hour of rest,<br />
is able to earn the notified <strong>MGNREGA</strong> minimum wage.