MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
52 <strong>MGNREGA</strong> Sameeksha<br />
labour, 42 there is no significant impact of <strong>MGNREGA</strong><br />
on out-flow of labour. 43 This may be because, to begin<br />
with only a limited percentage of population migrates<br />
out of the state for migration. In a study to assess<br />
the impact of <strong>MGNREGA</strong> on migration in Punjab,<br />
it was found that only around 5 per cent of the 300<br />
households in five districts reported migration from<br />
the village due to employment opportunities. 44<br />
The World Development Report 2009 contended<br />
that a reduction in migration, as caused by<br />
<strong>MGNREGA</strong>, is posing a barrier to internal mobility<br />
thus limiting economic growth of these households.<br />
A majority of the studies on the subject note that<br />
the Scheme has caused mostly a reduction in<br />
distress migration, and opportunistic or aspirational<br />
migration in search of better and more lucrative<br />
opportunities continues as before (particularly<br />
because <strong>MGNREGA</strong> cannot match the wages of<br />
skilled labour in cities). 45<br />
The reduction in distress migration may be<br />
more apparent in the case of households that need<br />
to migrate with their families; the entire family<br />
is forced to migrate to cities due to limited work<br />
opportunities. This leads to a disruption of children’s<br />
education and access to family health care. 46 A study<br />
across 12 districts of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh,<br />
Maharashtra and Rajasthan, found that out of 938<br />
beneficiaries, 55 per cent of the respondents felt<br />
that migration had been reduced in their families<br />
as a result of <strong>MGNREGA</strong>. Thirty-five per cent of the<br />
respondents (out of 938 respondents) felt that their<br />
children’s education had been positively benefitted<br />
by <strong>MGNREGA</strong>, while 30 per cent felt that their<br />
clothing had improved. 47 A longitudinal study across<br />
six districts in Andhra Pradesh also highlights the<br />
positive impact of the Scheme on reduction in child<br />
labour. As per the research, <strong>MGNREGA</strong> reduced<br />
the probability of a boy (whose family was provided<br />
Box 5.1<br />
<strong>MGNREGA</strong>: Stemming Distress Migration<br />
Recurring drought in western Odisha, has diminished opportunities for labour employment in the agriculture sector<br />
forcing people to migrate in large numbers to far off places like the brick kilns of Andhra Pradesh the carpet industry in<br />
Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Most of these migrants are the landless and marginal farmers who resort to distress<br />
mortgaging or selling of their little yet precious land and other assets and migrate out along with their families, taking<br />
their school-going children with them, leaving behind the old and aged.<br />
The interventions of eight partner organisations of the National Consortium of Civil Society Organisations (NCCSO)<br />
on <strong>MGNREGA</strong> working in western Odisha helped GPs to prepare plans worth Rs 18 crores in 59 villages between 2008<br />
and 2009. In a distress migration zone, in 2009–10, the number of migrating families came down to 45 per cent of the<br />
level in 2008–09.<br />
For instance, Ucchab Kumar’s family has been migrating out of their village in distress for the past three generations<br />
to work in Andhra’s brick kilns. Adhikar, a CSO working in Bolangir district, helped the GP plan and construct this<br />
farm pond under NREGA on Ucchab’s land in Juba village. This minor investment has helped to completely stop his<br />
and his family’s migration. Ucchab’s farm pond not only protects the main paddy crop on his own 2.5 acres but also<br />
provides protective irrigation to 5.5 acres of adjacent farm land belonging to his neighbours.<br />
Source: National Consortium of Civil Society Organizations (NCCSO), ‘<strong>MGNREGA</strong>: Opportunities, Challenges and the<br />
Road Ahead’, Second Report of the NCCSO on <strong>MGNREGA</strong>, 2011.<br />
42<br />
Cf. T. Shah and R. Indu, <strong>MGNREGA</strong> in Indo-Gangetic Basin: Fieldnotes from Here and There, Anand: International Water<br />
Management Institute (IWMI), 2009.<br />
43<br />
K. Vatta, D. K. Grover and T. Grover, ‘Impact of NREGA on Wage Rates, Food Security and Rural Urban Migration<br />
in Punjab’, Ludhiana: Agro-Economic Research Cente, Punjab Agriculture University, Report submitted to Ministry of<br />
Agriculture, 2011.<br />
44<br />
Ibid.<br />
45<br />
S. Verma, ‘Multiple Use Water Services in India: Scaling up Community based MUS through <strong>MGNREGA</strong>’, International<br />
Water Management Institute (IWMI), 2011.<br />
46<br />
P. Mistry and A. Jaswal, Study on the Implementation of NREGS: Focus on Migration, DISHA, 2009.<br />
47<br />
Ibid.