12.02.2014 Views

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 <strong>MGNREGA</strong> Sameeksha<br />

labour, 42 there is no significant impact of <strong>MGNREGA</strong><br />

on out-flow of labour. 43 This may be because, to begin<br />

with only a limited percentage of population migrates<br />

out of the state for migration. In a study to assess<br />

the impact of <strong>MGNREGA</strong> on migration in Punjab,<br />

it was found that only around 5 per cent of the 300<br />

households in five districts reported migration from<br />

the village due to employment opportunities. 44<br />

The World Development Report 2009 contended<br />

that a reduction in migration, as caused by<br />

<strong>MGNREGA</strong>, is posing a barrier to internal mobility<br />

thus limiting economic growth of these households.<br />

A majority of the studies on the subject note that<br />

the Scheme has caused mostly a reduction in<br />

distress migration, and opportunistic or aspirational<br />

migration in search of better and more lucrative<br />

opportunities continues as before (particularly<br />

because <strong>MGNREGA</strong> cannot match the wages of<br />

skilled labour in cities). 45<br />

The reduction in distress migration may be<br />

more apparent in the case of households that need<br />

to migrate with their families; the entire family<br />

is forced to migrate to cities due to limited work<br />

opportunities. This leads to a disruption of children’s<br />

education and access to family health care. 46 A study<br />

across 12 districts of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh,<br />

Maharashtra and Rajasthan, found that out of 938<br />

beneficiaries, 55 per cent of the respondents felt<br />

that migration had been reduced in their families<br />

as a result of <strong>MGNREGA</strong>. Thirty-five per cent of the<br />

respondents (out of 938 respondents) felt that their<br />

children’s education had been positively benefitted<br />

by <strong>MGNREGA</strong>, while 30 per cent felt that their<br />

clothing had improved. 47 A longitudinal study across<br />

six districts in Andhra Pradesh also highlights the<br />

positive impact of the Scheme on reduction in child<br />

labour. As per the research, <strong>MGNREGA</strong> reduced<br />

the probability of a boy (whose family was provided<br />

Box 5.1<br />

<strong>MGNREGA</strong>: Stemming Distress Migration<br />

Recurring drought in western Odisha, has diminished opportunities for labour employment in the agriculture sector<br />

forcing people to migrate in large numbers to far off places like the brick kilns of Andhra Pradesh the carpet industry in<br />

Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Most of these migrants are the landless and marginal farmers who resort to distress<br />

mortgaging or selling of their little yet precious land and other assets and migrate out along with their families, taking<br />

their school-going children with them, leaving behind the old and aged.<br />

The interventions of eight partner organisations of the National Consortium of Civil Society Organisations (NCCSO)<br />

on <strong>MGNREGA</strong> working in western Odisha helped GPs to prepare plans worth Rs 18 crores in 59 villages between 2008<br />

and 2009. In a distress migration zone, in 2009–10, the number of migrating families came down to 45 per cent of the<br />

level in 2008–09.<br />

For instance, Ucchab Kumar’s family has been migrating out of their village in distress for the past three generations<br />

to work in Andhra’s brick kilns. Adhikar, a CSO working in Bolangir district, helped the GP plan and construct this<br />

farm pond under NREGA on Ucchab’s land in Juba village. This minor investment has helped to completely stop his<br />

and his family’s migration. Ucchab’s farm pond not only protects the main paddy crop on his own 2.5 acres but also<br />

provides protective irrigation to 5.5 acres of adjacent farm land belonging to his neighbours.<br />

Source: National Consortium of Civil Society Organizations (NCCSO), ‘<strong>MGNREGA</strong>: Opportunities, Challenges and the<br />

Road Ahead’, Second Report of the NCCSO on <strong>MGNREGA</strong>, 2011.<br />

42<br />

Cf. T. Shah and R. Indu, <strong>MGNREGA</strong> in Indo-Gangetic Basin: Fieldnotes from Here and There, Anand: International Water<br />

Management Institute (IWMI), 2009.<br />

43<br />

K. Vatta, D. K. Grover and T. Grover, ‘Impact of NREGA on Wage Rates, Food Security and Rural Urban Migration<br />

in Punjab’, Ludhiana: Agro-Economic Research Cente, Punjab Agriculture University, Report submitted to Ministry of<br />

Agriculture, 2011.<br />

44<br />

Ibid.<br />

45<br />

S. Verma, ‘Multiple Use Water Services in India: Scaling up Community based MUS through <strong>MGNREGA</strong>’, International<br />

Water Management Institute (IWMI), 2011.<br />

46<br />

P. Mistry and A. Jaswal, Study on the Implementation of NREGS: Focus on Migration, DISHA, 2009.<br />

47<br />

Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!