12.02.2014 Views

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

MGNREGA_SAMEEKSHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Governance and Process Challenges 69<br />

Box 6.6 (contd.)<br />

Social Audits in Andhra Pradesh<br />

significant impact on generating awareness among beneficiaries as well as in improving quality of implementation<br />

of the Scheme. The difference in awareness levels before and after is in Fig. 6.2. Social audits also improved record<br />

maintenance and worksite implementation. The study found that entries in JCs increased from 39 per cent to 99 per<br />

cent. The availability of drinking water at worksites also went up from 79 per cent to 95 per cent.<br />

Figure 6.2<br />

Improvements in Awareness Levels Before and After Social Audits<br />

120<br />

100<br />

% who knew the right answer<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100 Days Guarantee No Machines No Contractors Can demand work<br />

Before Social Audit 1 month after Social Audit 6 months after Social Audit<br />

Source: Y. Aiyar, and S. Samji, The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act: Design, Process and Impact, Delhi: Ministry of<br />

Rural Development, 2009.<br />

Learning from the experience of Andhra Pradesh,<br />

the GoI notified Social Audit rules, outlining in<br />

detail the processes and procedures for conducting<br />

quality audits by State Governments (see Chapter<br />

7). Regular monitoring is done through the MIS and<br />

regular follow-up with states that are not conducting<br />

social audits, is also undertaken.<br />

Grievance Redressal<br />

Ineffective grievance redressal remains a concern<br />

in implementation of the Scheme. Studies point out<br />

that it is necessary to strengthen grievance redressal<br />

systems to address issues of corruption as well as<br />

other process issues. While the Act provides that<br />

each State formulate grievance redressal rules, few<br />

State governments have done so. 65<br />

In view of the need to strengthen grievance redressal,<br />

the GoI amended the <strong>MGNREGA</strong>’s Schedule to<br />

prescribe rules for speedy and effective disposal of<br />

complaints. States have also been advised to set<br />

up district level ombudsman to receive complaints<br />

from <strong>MGNREGA</strong> workers and other stakeholders<br />

and facilitate their redressal. Currently five states<br />

have set up district level Ombudsman, viz. Punjab,<br />

Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram and Himachal Pradesh<br />

65<br />

J. Dreze, ‘The Accountability Gap’, in The Battle for Employment Guarantee, ed. R. Khera, New Delhi: Oxford University<br />

Press, 2011, pp. 266–69.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!