13.02.2014 Views

戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學

戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學

戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

戰 略 研 究 的 批 判 與 反 思 : 典 範 的 困 境 43<br />

Booth, Ken. 1991. New Thinking about Strategy and International<br />

Security. London: Harper Collins Academic.<br />

Booth, Ken. 1994. “Strategy.” in A. J. R. Groom and Margot Light. eds.<br />

Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory:<br />

109-119. London: Mansfield Publishing Limited.<br />

Booth, Ken. 1996. “75 Years on: Rewriting the Subject’s Past—<br />

Reinventing its Future.” in Steven Smith et al. eds. International<br />

Theory: Positivism and Beyond: 328-339. Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press.<br />

Brodie, Bernard. 1959. “The Anatomy of Deterrence.” World Politics<br />

51, 2: 173-192.<br />

Brodie, Bernard. 1973. War and Politics. London: Macmillan<br />

Bull, Hedley. 1968. “Strategic Studies and its Critics.” World Politics<br />

20, 4: 593-605.<br />

Burns, Robert B. 2000. Introduction to Research Methods. London:<br />

Sage Publication.<br />

Buzan, Barry. 1987. An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military<br />

Technology and International Relations. London: Macmillan.<br />

Buzan, Barry. 1991. People, State and Fear: An Agenda for<br />

International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd ed.<br />

Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.<br />

Buzan, Barry. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London:<br />

Lynne Rienner Publishers.<br />

Chipman, John. 1992. “The Future of Strategic Studies.” Survival 34, 1:<br />

109-131.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!