戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學
戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學
戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
戰 略 研 究 的 批 判 與 反 思 : 典 範 的 困 境 43<br />
Booth, Ken. 1991. New Thinking about Strategy and International<br />
Security. London: Harper Collins Academic.<br />
Booth, Ken. 1994. “Strategy.” in A. J. R. Groom and Margot Light. eds.<br />
Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory:<br />
109-119. London: Mansfield Publishing Limited.<br />
Booth, Ken. 1996. “75 Years on: Rewriting the Subject’s Past—<br />
Reinventing its Future.” in Steven Smith et al. eds. International<br />
Theory: Positivism and Beyond: 328-339. Cambridge: Cambridge<br />
University Press.<br />
Brodie, Bernard. 1959. “The Anatomy of Deterrence.” World Politics<br />
51, 2: 173-192.<br />
Brodie, Bernard. 1973. War and Politics. London: Macmillan<br />
Bull, Hedley. 1968. “Strategic Studies and its Critics.” World Politics<br />
20, 4: 593-605.<br />
Burns, Robert B. 2000. Introduction to Research Methods. London:<br />
Sage Publication.<br />
Buzan, Barry. 1987. An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military<br />
Technology and International Relations. London: Macmillan.<br />
Buzan, Barry. 1991. People, State and Fear: An Agenda for<br />
International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd ed.<br />
Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.<br />
Buzan, Barry. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London:<br />
Lynne Rienner Publishers.<br />
Chipman, John. 1992. “The Future of Strategic Studies.” Survival 34, 1:<br />
109-131.