13.02.2014 Views

戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學

戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學

戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

戰 略 研 究 的 批 判 與 反 思 : 典 範 的 困 境 49<br />

Latham, Robert. 1995. “Thinking About Security after the Cold War.”<br />

Policy Note 20, 3: 1-9.<br />

Laudan, Larry. 1998. “Dissecting the Holist Picture of Scientific<br />

Change.” in Martin Curd and J. A. Cover. eds. Philosophy of<br />

Science: The Central Issues: 140-145. London and New York: W.<br />

W. Norton and Company.<br />

Lebow, Richard Ned. 1994. “The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War,<br />

and the Failure of Realism.” International Organization 48, 2:<br />

249-77.<br />

Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein. 1995. We All Lost the<br />

Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.<br />

Luttwak, Edward. N. 1987. The Logic of Peace. Cambridge, MA:<br />

Harvard University Press.<br />

McLean, Iain. 1996. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics. Oxford:<br />

Oxford University Press.<br />

Moran, Daniel. 2002. “Strategic Theory and the History of War.” in<br />

John Baylis et al. eds. Strategy in the Contemporary World: An<br />

Introduction to Strategic Studies: 17-43. Oxford: Oxford<br />

University Press.<br />

Murray, Williamson and Mark Grimsley. 1994. “Introduction: On<br />

Strategy.” in Williamson Murray et al. eds. The Making of<br />

Strategy: Rulers, States, and War: 1-25. Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press.<br />

Nye Jr., Joseph S. and Sean M. Lynne-Jones. 1988. “International<br />

Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!