戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學
戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學
戰略研究的批判與反思: 典範的困境 - 東吳大學
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
戰 略 研 究 的 批 判 與 反 思 : 典 範 的 困 境 49<br />
Latham, Robert. 1995. “Thinking About Security after the Cold War.”<br />
Policy Note 20, 3: 1-9.<br />
Laudan, Larry. 1998. “Dissecting the Holist Picture of Scientific<br />
Change.” in Martin Curd and J. A. Cover. eds. Philosophy of<br />
Science: The Central Issues: 140-145. London and New York: W.<br />
W. Norton and Company.<br />
Lebow, Richard Ned. 1994. “The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War,<br />
and the Failure of Realism.” International Organization 48, 2:<br />
249-77.<br />
Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein. 1995. We All Lost the<br />
Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.<br />
Luttwak, Edward. N. 1987. The Logic of Peace. Cambridge, MA:<br />
Harvard University Press.<br />
McLean, Iain. 1996. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics. Oxford:<br />
Oxford University Press.<br />
Moran, Daniel. 2002. “Strategic Theory and the History of War.” in<br />
John Baylis et al. eds. Strategy in the Contemporary World: An<br />
Introduction to Strategic Studies: 17-43. Oxford: Oxford<br />
University Press.<br />
Murray, Williamson and Mark Grimsley. 1994. “Introduction: On<br />
Strategy.” in Williamson Murray et al. eds. The Making of<br />
Strategy: Rulers, States, and War: 1-25. Cambridge: Cambridge<br />
University Press.<br />
Nye Jr., Joseph S. and Sean M. Lynne-Jones. 1988. “International<br />
Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the