The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> <strong>21</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />
Action Plan to all municipal departments and agencies.<br />
Internal audits can be undertaken by external consultants or can be organized as participatory processes involving municipal staff. A<br />
participatory process will better guarantee that the Plan itself is fully understood, discussed, and even challenged by the municipal<br />
professionals who take responsibility for much of its implementation. In some cases, the review might result in proposals from staff<br />
to alter the Plan so that it can be better implemented.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two key elements of an effective auditing procedure are the audit criteria and the audit protocol. <strong>The</strong> audit criteria are the<br />
measures against which performance will be measured. <strong>The</strong> criteria are defined by the person requesting the audit and should be<br />
communicated to the party being audited prior to beginning the audit. In the case of sustainable development planning, the criteria<br />
are defined to test the consistency of current municipal practices, procedures, and policies with the goals, targets, and action<br />
strategies of the Action Plan.<br />
<strong>The</strong> audit protocol consists of a set of procedures that will be used by the auditor to determine performance relative to the criteria.<br />
By applying a clear audit protocol, a similar audit by different auditors should produce similar results.<br />
Reform the standard operating procedures of municipal departments to assure compatibility with the Action Plan. Create<br />
an internal management system to review the compatibility of proposed projects or developments with the Action Plan.<br />
5.3.2 REFORM OF PROCEDURES, RULES, AND STANDARDS<br />
Based upon an internal audit of the compatibility of municipal practices with the plan, a municipality can identify and define what<br />
procedures, rules, and standards will need to be reformed in order to support implementation of the Plan. An inter-departmental<br />
committee can serve as an internal stakeholder group to review proposals generated by staff and prepare a comprehensive proposal<br />
for procedural reform to be submitted to department heads or directly to the elected municipal Council.<br />
5.3.3 INTERNAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM<br />
Following an initial audit and reform of municipal procedures, a system needs to be put in place to ensure that future actions or plans<br />
of the municipality are consistent with the objectives set forward in the Plan. For this purpose, a variety of environmental<br />
management systems (EMS) have been designed for both private sector and government application. <strong>The</strong>se systems establish the<br />
organizational structure, responsibilities, and procedures that will be consistently used by the municipality to achieve its goals and<br />
control its impacts. Typical EMS procedures require systematic internal reviews of proposed development activities before these<br />
proposals are submitted to decision-making bodies. <strong>The</strong>se procedures identify the extent of possible impacts that a project might<br />
have and define when a detailed environmental or social impact assessment should be undertaken to help mitigate negative impacts.<br />
Case #16 presents the environmental management system applied by the City of Ottawa, Canada, to assure that all development<br />
activities undertaken by any municipal department are reviewed before implementation. <strong>The</strong> Ottawa system is a general review<br />
system to assure compliance with environmental regulations and is not linked to any specific Action Plan. <strong>The</strong> Regional<br />
Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth, Canada, has established a simple procedure that requires all departmental submissions to<br />
Regional Council Committees to be evaluated according to how the proposal would advance or undermine implementation of its<br />
VISION 2020 Action Plan. <strong>The</strong> reporting procedure is described in the region’s Sustainable Community Decision Making <strong>Guide</strong>,<br />
which was officially adopted by the Regional Council.<br />
In another case (Case #7), New York City, USA, established the position of an environmental Ombudsman to work with the<br />
community of<br />
WORKSHEET 7 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR ACTION PLAN TARGETS<br />
http://www.idrc.ca/openebooks/448-2/ (115 of 180)18/10/2010 12:47:23 AM