The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> <strong>21</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />
converts complex concepts of carrying capacity, sustainability, resource use, and waste disposal into mathematical information and<br />
charts. <strong>The</strong> tool is both analytical and educational. It not only assesses the sustainability of current human activities, but is also<br />
effective in building public awareness and assisting in decision making.<br />
Environmental Auditing<br />
Environmental auditing involves the systematic examination of environmental information about an organization, facility, or site, to<br />
verify whether, or to what extent, it conforms to specified audit criteria. <strong>The</strong> criteria may be based on local, national, or international<br />
environmental standards, national laws and regulations, permits and concessions, internal management systems specifications,<br />
corporate standards, or guidelines of organizations. Environmental audits provide a snapshot of the environmental situation at a<br />
given time. <strong>The</strong>y do not attempt to predict the potential impacts of planned activities. <strong>The</strong>re are various types of environmental<br />
audits, which may differ with the scope and objectives of the study.<br />
An environmental audit generates reliable environmental information and may assess the potential environmental risks enterprises<br />
could cause, their environmental liabilities, and their degree of compliance with environmental standards and legislation. Within the<br />
planning context, environmental audits provide a source of information for assessing the implementation of a project against<br />
requirements derived from an environmental assessment. <strong>The</strong>y can also serve as a source of base-line information.<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment and Social Impact Assessment<br />
<strong>The</strong> most comprehensive and analytical methods used today for auditing are Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Social<br />
Impact Assessment (SIA). Both of these methods have been employed internationally for many years and are supported by extensive<br />
academic, research, and training networks. EIA and SIA employ a wide range of methods, depending upon the required<br />
sophistication of the assessment.<br />
EIA and SIA use past and present data to predict the impacts of planned or future practices. Specific tools have been developed to<br />
identify the linkages between proposed activities and the different components of the natural or social environment that could be<br />
impacted. Further tools and techniques are available to predict and quantify impacts. Methods are established for evaluating the<br />
importance of possible impacts, including weighting techniques and risk assessment. Finally EIA and SIA propose ways to reduce,<br />
avoid, compensate, and monitor impacts.<br />
EIA and SIA techniques are highly effective for project-based assessments. However, because the use of EIA and SIA is commonly<br />
triggered by a specific development proposal, it tends to be reactive and does not offer a view of the overall trends that result from<br />
the cumulative impact of individual development decisions and that constrain the opportunities for sustainable service delivery. In<br />
response to these shortcomings, new experiments have been conducted to undertake “cumulative effects assessments.” However, the<br />
methodologies for conducting cumulative effects assessments are not well established.<br />
Focus Groups<br />
Focus groups are generally conducted with small groups of four to twelve selected participants who represent particular communities<br />
and community interests. In a facilitated session, lasting anywhere from two hours to two days, participants are presented with ideas<br />
or proposals, after which professional facilitators solicit people’s reactions to what they have heard. <strong>The</strong> aim is to clarify values,<br />
feelings, concerns, and understandings of the representative group. Historically, focus groups have been used by businesses or<br />
political parties in developing marketing strategies. However, focus groups are increasingly used by social scientists and<br />
development practitioners to gather qualitative rather than statistical information from a sample group or several sample groups.<br />
Focus groups can be used to refine preliminary ideas and provide information to be used in other consultation activities. Setting up a<br />
focus group process, including the selection of a sample group and the facilitation of sessions, requires trained facilitators.<br />
In the context of sustainable development planning, a focus group meeting is a useful information-gathering tool that can be used to<br />
gain insight into public/community issues and priorities and to obtain feedback on action proposals.<br />
Force Field Analysis<br />
Force field analysis is a facilitated and structured exercise in which participants identify specific hindering and facilitating forces<br />
affecting the functioning of any situation, assess the relative strength of each force, and plan alternative actions to overcome or<br />
promote these forces. Force field analysis is useful for achieving a shared understanding of opportunities and constraints that can<br />
influence a desired goal. This enables stakeholders to better determine which action strategies will be most effective and to set<br />
http://www.idrc.ca/openebooks/448-2/ (157 of 180)18/10/2010 12:47:23 AM