The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide - Democrats Against UN ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> <strong>21</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />
In October 1995, Leicester City Council completed the firs) stage of the three-slage sustainable development planning process<br />
illustrated in Figure 9, the “Blueprint for Leicester Process.” <strong>The</strong> first stage in the creation of the Leicester Blueprint involved<br />
public consultation. Over 2000 individuals ond more than 100 groups and organizations were consulted over a period of 12 months<br />
to solicit public input into the Leicester Blueprint, A variety of consultation methods were employed:<br />
• a neighborhood survey of 748 Leicester households was conducted to identify the views of a representative crosssection<br />
of the public;<br />
• a short ‘Snapshot’ questionnaire wos sent to all homes via the City Council’s Link magazine and a local paper. It<br />
was also made availoble in leaflet form; 803 were relumed;<br />
• eighty-eight priority target groups representing businesses, women, disabled people, young people, older people,<br />
cultural and ethnic minority communities, people on low incomes, and other voluntary and workplace-based<br />
groups took part in meetings and events, developed projects, and made written comments; and<br />
• the eight Environment City Specialist Working Groups, together representing 29 organizations, were invited to<br />
submit their comments in detail; all eight did so.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Snapshot questionnaire, designed to be brief, allowed the participation of individuals who might otherwise have been excluded<br />
from the process. <strong>The</strong> questions consisted of a mixture of open and closed questions related to environment, economy, and society.<br />
<strong>The</strong> open questions asked about people’s likes and dislikes and suggested improvements lo the city. <strong>The</strong> closed questions focused<br />
on a topical ond holly debated issue, transportation policy, and on specific factors that influenced quolity of life. <strong>The</strong> results were<br />
intended to be viewed in conjunction with the in-depth neighborhood survey and extensive consultation with special interest groups.<br />
<strong>The</strong> in-depth neighborhood questionnaire contained four types of questions related to the environment, economy, and society:<br />
profile questions to confirm a representative survey; satisfaction questions to identify areas of dissatisfaction with aspects of the city<br />
and quality of life; priority questions that asked about a series of policy options they would most support; and open questions to ask<br />
respondents why they felt a certain way, to add details to a response, or to make suggestions.<br />
Priority target groups were approached through key organizations and with varied community specific consultation tools. For<br />
example, older people were surveyed through a questionnaire (some implemented in face to face interviews, others were completed<br />
by indi viduals) and in-depth interviews with o small number of respondents. In another instance, the business community was<br />
engaged in facilitated visioning processes using SWOT analysis A survey was also conducted to target 200 small businesses.<br />
<strong>The</strong> final report, the Blueprint for Leicester Report Findings, documents the results from each of the consultations, for each specific<br />
large) groups. <strong>The</strong>se findings will be used to look at key areas of conflict ond to build consensus for the development of <strong>Local</strong><br />
<strong>Agenda</strong> <strong>21</strong> Action Plans.<br />
1. Enviton, beicester City Council, and feicester Promotions Bluepring for leicester Findings. Leocester, UK: leicester City<br />
Council 1995<br />
Assuring Appropriateness of Methods and Tools<br />
Involving local communities and “lay persons” in assessment requires the use of methods and tools that complement the culture,<br />
educational levels, and size of each group, as well as local resource and time constraints. <strong>The</strong> selection of methods and tools should<br />
consider indigenous modes of communication and forums for sharing information. Tools may also need to be<br />
FIGURE 9 THE BLUEPRINT FOR LEICESTER PROCESS<br />
http://www.idrc.ca/openebooks/448-2/ (47 of 180)18/10/2010 12:47:23 AM