Making Targeted Sanctions Effective - Small Arms Survey
Making Targeted Sanctions Effective - Small Arms Survey
Making Targeted Sanctions Effective - Small Arms Survey
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE STOCKHOLM PROCESS | 36<br />
of specialized professions, with varying levels of knowledge of the<br />
inner workings of the UN and of UN sanctions policy, they would<br />
benefit from a more systematic process of orientation, including<br />
familiarization with the work and best practices of other Expert<br />
Panels and Monitoring Mechanisms. Many experts, however, have<br />
begun their work equipped with only the relevant Security Council<br />
resolutions and rudimentary instructions from their <strong>Sanctions</strong> Committee.<br />
While these instructions prescribe the mandate and basic<br />
parameters of the investigations, they do not always offer guidance<br />
as to how they might best proceed. Very often, experts have been<br />
left to “make it up as we went along,” only to discover later that they<br />
had inadvertently and needlessly duplicated the work of other panels<br />
and monitoring mechanisms.<br />
§ 71<br />
Information Management<br />
Improvement is also needed in the area of information management.<br />
Currently, there is no centralized, retrievable database for the<br />
documents and information accumulated by the individual Expert<br />
Panels. Indeed, for lack of a home, this material largely remains in<br />
the custody of individual experts, thereby remaining inaccessible to<br />
both the <strong>Sanctions</strong> Branch and the other Expert Panels and Monitoring<br />
Mechanisms, whose work could benefit from it. There is an<br />
urgent necessity to establish a system within the Secretariat where<br />
the accumulated materials on sanctions monitoring and sanctions<br />
violations can be consolidated and made available to investigators,<br />
monitors, and UN policymakers.<br />
Common Guidelines<br />
§ 72 Likewise, Expert investigations have been hampered by a lack of<br />
procedural guidelines that could assist them in the design of working<br />
methods, investigative procedures, standards of evidence, and<br />
reporting formats. Of particular concern was the need for a clear<br />
and transparent set of principles to assure that investigations and<br />
reports meet the highest evidentiary standards. While all Expert<br />
Panels endeavor to be rigorous, in some cases, their reports have<br />
been found wanting, either because some allegations were based on