09.03.2014 Views

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong> which the well is operated dur<strong>in</strong>g three successive<br />

and equal time periods at constant fractions of full capacity.<br />

<strong>St</strong>ep-drawdown test data are available for n<strong>in</strong>e wells<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong>. The results of the step-drawdown<br />

tests and construction features of the wells tested<br />

are given <strong>in</strong> table 14. Well-loss constants for wells<br />

tested immediately after construction range from 0.2<br />

to 1.0 sec 2 /ft 5 .<br />

Specific-capacity data collected dur<strong>in</strong>g well-production<br />

tests made on 32 <strong>in</strong>dustrial, municipal, and irrigation<br />

wells are given <strong>in</strong> table 15. The well-production tests<br />

consisted of pump<strong>in</strong>g a well at a constant rate and frequently<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g the drawdown <strong>in</strong> the pumped well.<br />

Drawdowns were commonly measured with an airl<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

electric dropl<strong>in</strong>e, or steel tape; rates of pump<strong>in</strong>g were<br />

largely measured by means of a circular orifice at the end<br />

of the pump discharge pipe.<br />

The lengths of tests ranged from 11 m<strong>in</strong>utes to 2<br />

days; pump<strong>in</strong>g rates ranged from 104 to 1905 gpm.<br />

Screen diameters ranged from 8 to 32 <strong>in</strong>ches.<br />

Specific-capacity data for 65 selected relief wells are<br />

given <strong>in</strong> table 16. The wells were tested dur<strong>in</strong>g the period<br />

1952 through 1960 by the U.S. Corps of Eng<strong>in</strong>eers.<br />

The saturated thickness of the aquifer at well sites was<br />

estimated from logs of wells and <strong>water</strong>-level data. The<br />

tests consisted of pump<strong>in</strong>g the wells at a constant rate of<br />

500 gpm for 2 hours and frequently measur<strong>in</strong>g the drawdown<br />

<strong>in</strong> the pumped well.<br />

A coefficient of storage <strong>in</strong> the <strong>water</strong>-table range<br />

(0.10) estimated from aquifer-test data and several<br />

values of t and r w were used (see Walton 1962) to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the relationship between specific capacity and<br />

the coefficient of transmissibility for various values of<br />

r w 2 /t (figure 22). Specific capacities, data concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the lengths of tests and radii of wells <strong>in</strong> tables 15 and<br />

16, and figure 23 were used to estimate theoretical coefficients<br />

of transmissibility of the aquifer with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

cones of depression of production wells. Theoretical<br />

coefficients of permeability with<strong>in</strong> the cones of depression<br />

were estimated by divid<strong>in</strong>g the coefficient of transmissibility<br />

by the average saturated thickness of the<br />

aquifer with<strong>in</strong> cones of depression The average saturated<br />

thickness of the aquifer with<strong>in</strong> cones of depression<br />

was estimated from logs of wells and <strong>water</strong>-level data.<br />

No great accuracy is implied for the coefficients of<br />

permeabilities estimated from specific-capacity data because<br />

they are based on an estimated coefficient of storage<br />

and are not corrected for well-loss and partial penetration<br />

losses. However, as shown <strong>in</strong> table 14, well-loss<br />

constants for most newly constructed wells are small.<br />

Most wells penetrate completely the more permeable parts<br />

of the aquifer. Thus, well and partial penetration losses<br />

were probably small and not significant. The data <strong>in</strong><br />

tables 15 and 16 can be considered only rough approximations<br />

of the coefficient of permeability of the aquifer.<br />

However, the coefficients of permeability <strong>in</strong> the Monsanto<br />

<strong>area</strong> estimated from specific-capacity data agree<br />

closely with the coefficients of permeability computed<br />

from aquifer tests at the Mobil Oil Ref<strong>in</strong>ery and the Monsanto<br />

Chemical Corporation, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the estimated<br />

coefficients of permeability are mean<strong>in</strong>gful.<br />

Water-level and pumpage data for exist<strong>in</strong>g pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

centers were used to compute pump<strong>in</strong>g center specific<br />

capacities given <strong>in</strong> table 17. Pump<strong>in</strong>g center specific capacity<br />

is here def<strong>in</strong>ed as the total pumpage from wells<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the pump<strong>in</strong>g center per foot of average drawdown<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the pump<strong>in</strong>g center.<br />

Summary of Aquifer-Test Data<br />

A map show<strong>in</strong>g how the coefficient of permeability<br />

varies with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong> (figure 23) was<br />

Owner<br />

Mobil Oil Co.<br />

Screen<br />

length<br />

Driller<br />

(ft)<br />

Luhr Bros. 36<br />

Table 14. Results of <strong>St</strong>ep-■Drawdown Tests<br />

Screen<br />

diameter<br />

f<strong>in</strong>)<br />

16<br />

Screen Material<br />

Johnson Everdur<br />

No. 50 slot<br />

Date<br />

well<br />

drilled<br />

12/59<br />

Date<br />

of<br />

test<br />

Well-loss<br />

constant<br />

(sec 2 /ft 5 )<br />

10/61 2.0<br />

Southwestern Layne-Western 20 10 Slotted pipe 11/60 12/60 0.2<br />

Campus of SIU,<br />

Edwardsville<br />

Coll<strong>in</strong>sville (V) Layne-Western 30 16 Layne No. 4 slot 8/50 8/50 0.7<br />

Thomason Thorpe 32 X 40 Porous concrete 5/54 5/54 0.2<br />

Amos Bonham Thorpe 30 X 40 Porous concrete 10/54 4/55 0.45<br />

Herbert Bischoff Thorpe 60 30 X 40 Porous concrete 1/54 5/54 0.5<br />

V. W. Eckmann Thorpe 48 30 X 40 Porous concrete 9/54 10/54 1.0<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Louis</strong> Luhr Bros. Wood 4/55 5/55 1.0<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong>age Dist.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Louis</strong> Luhr Bros. Wood 4/55 5/55 1.0<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong>age Dist.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!