09.03.2014 Views

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>water</strong> levels due to the changes <strong>in</strong> the stage of the Mississippi<br />

River, and piezometric surface maps under assumed<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g conditions were prepared. The pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

center discharge rates that resulted <strong>in</strong> a piezometric surface<br />

map with the critical <strong>water</strong>-level elevations <strong>in</strong> table<br />

33 were assigned to the practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yields of the<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g centers. The practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yields of the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g pump<strong>in</strong>g centers are given <strong>in</strong> table 34.<br />

Table 34.<br />

Practical Susta<strong>in</strong>ed Yields of Exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Major Pump<strong>in</strong>g Centers<br />

Year after<br />

1962 Additional Practical which practical<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g possible susta<strong>in</strong>ed susta<strong>in</strong>ed yield<br />

Pump<strong>in</strong>g rate withdrawal yield may be<br />

center (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) exceeded<br />

Alton <strong>area</strong> 6.3 9.7 16 2000<br />

Wood River <strong>area</strong> 14.1 5.9 20 1990<br />

Granite City <strong>area</strong> 9.5 5.5 15 1980<br />

National City <strong>area</strong> 11.6 6.4 18 2000<br />

Monsanto <strong>area</strong> 22.6 0.4 23 1965<br />

Total 64.1 27.9 92<br />

Estimates were made of the probable dates when<br />

practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yields of exist<strong>in</strong>g pump<strong>in</strong>g centers<br />

may be exceeded. Pumpage totals from 1890 through<br />

1962 <strong>in</strong> the Alton, Wood River, Granite City, National<br />

City, and Monsanto <strong>area</strong>s are shown <strong>in</strong> figures 35 and 36.<br />

The past average rate of pumpage <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> each pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

center was estimated and extended to <strong>in</strong>tersect the<br />

practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yield of each pump<strong>in</strong>g center. The<br />

assumption was made that the distribution of pumpage<br />

will rema<strong>in</strong> the same as it was <strong>in</strong> 1962. It is estimated<br />

that the practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yield of the Alton <strong>area</strong><br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g center (16 mgd) will be reached after the year<br />

2000; the practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yield of the Wood River<br />

<strong>area</strong> pump<strong>in</strong>g center (20 mgd) will be reached about<br />

1990; and the practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yield of the Granite<br />

City <strong>area</strong> pump<strong>in</strong>g center (15 mgd) will be reached<br />

about 1980.<br />

It is estimated that the practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yield of<br />

the National City <strong>area</strong> pump<strong>in</strong>g center (18 mgd) will<br />

be reached about the year 2000. The rate of pumpage<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> the National City <strong>area</strong> may <strong>in</strong>crease markedly,<br />

however, because of the effects of a series of dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />

wells be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stalled to permanently de<strong>water</strong> a cut<br />

along an <strong>in</strong>terstate highway near National City. Pumpage<br />

from the dra<strong>in</strong>age wells was not known at the time<br />

this report was prepared.<br />

Pumpage <strong>in</strong> the Monsanto <strong>area</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g 1962 (22.6<br />

mgd) is near the estimated practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yield of<br />

23 mgd.<br />

No great accuracy is <strong>in</strong>ferred for the estimated dates<br />

when practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yields may be exceeded <strong>in</strong> table<br />

34; they are given only to aid future <strong>water</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g. A<br />

reasonable extrapolation of the pumpage graphs <strong>in</strong> figures<br />

35 and 36 suggests that total ground-<strong>water</strong> withdrawals<br />

from wells <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g major pump<strong>in</strong>g centers<br />

will exceed the practical susta<strong>in</strong>ed yields by about 2000.<br />

POTENTIAL YIELD OF AQUIFER WITH A SELECTED SCHEME OF DEVELOPMENT<br />

The electric analog computer was used to describe<br />

the effects of a selected scheme of <strong>development</strong> and to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the potential yield of the aquifer under assumed<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g conditions. The potential yield of the<br />

aquifer is here def<strong>in</strong>ed as the maximum amount of <strong>water</strong><br />

that can be cont<strong>in</strong>uously withdrawn from a selected system<br />

of well fields without creat<strong>in</strong>g critical <strong>water</strong> levels or<br />

exceed<strong>in</strong>g recharge.<br />

The distribution of pumpage with the selected scheme<br />

of <strong>development</strong> is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 66. A comparison of<br />

figures 66 and 34 shows that, with the exceptions of three<br />

new pump<strong>in</strong>g centers near the river and one new pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

center <strong>in</strong> the Dupo <strong>area</strong>, the selected scheme of <strong>development</strong><br />

is the same as the actual scheme of <strong>development</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> 1962.<br />

Critical nonpump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>water</strong> levels for exist<strong>in</strong>g and assumed<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g centers (see table 33) were estimated<br />

from figures 6, 64, and 65 tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to consideration the<br />

effects of de<strong>water</strong><strong>in</strong>g. The electric analog computer was<br />

used to determ<strong>in</strong>e pump<strong>in</strong>g center discharge rates that<br />

would cause <strong>water</strong> levels <strong>in</strong> all major pump<strong>in</strong>g centers<br />

to decl<strong>in</strong>e to the critical stages <strong>in</strong> table 33. Several values<br />

of discharge <strong>in</strong> major pump<strong>in</strong>g centers and anticipated<br />

discharge rates for m<strong>in</strong>or pump<strong>in</strong>g centers based on<br />

extrapolations of pumpage graphs for m<strong>in</strong>or pumpage<br />

centers to the year 2015 were assumed and <strong>water</strong>-level<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>es throughout the <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong> were determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Model aquifers and mathematical models<br />

(Walton, 1962) based on available geohydrologic data<br />

and <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong>filtration rates were used<br />

to determ<strong>in</strong>e the local effects of withdrawals <strong>in</strong> pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

centers near the river. Water-level decl<strong>in</strong>es were superposed<br />

on the piezometric surface map for 1900 together<br />

with changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>water</strong> levels due to the changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

stage of the Mississippi River, and piezometric surface<br />

maps under assumed pump<strong>in</strong>g conditions were prepared.<br />

The total pump<strong>in</strong>g center discharge rate that resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

a piezometric surface map with the critical <strong>water</strong>-level<br />

elevations <strong>in</strong> table 33 was assigned to the potential yield<br />

of the aquifer with the selected scheme of <strong>development</strong>.<br />

The potential yield, subdivided by pump<strong>in</strong>g center, is<br />

given <strong>in</strong> table 35; <strong>water</strong>-level decl<strong>in</strong>es and approximate<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!