09.03.2014 Views

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

Ground-water development in East St. Louis area, Illinois. Urbana, IL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Generally ground-<strong>water</strong> recharge <strong>in</strong> the <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong> is greatest <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g and early summer<br />

months of heavy ra<strong>in</strong>fall and least <strong>in</strong> the late summer,<br />

fall, and w<strong>in</strong>ter months. Most recharge occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

spr<strong>in</strong>g months when evapotranspiration is small and<br />

soil moisture is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at or above field capacity by<br />

frequent ra<strong>in</strong>s. Dur<strong>in</strong>g summer and fall months evapotranspiration<br />

and soil moisture requirements have first<br />

priority on precipitation and are so great that little precipitation<br />

percolates to the <strong>water</strong> table except dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

periods of excessive ra<strong>in</strong>fall.<br />

Recharge directly from precipitation was estimated<br />

by flow-net analyses of the piezometric surface <strong>in</strong> the<br />

vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the Wood River, Granite City, National City,<br />

and Monsanto <strong>area</strong> pump<strong>in</strong>g centers. The quantity of<br />

<strong>water</strong> percolat<strong>in</strong>g through a given cross section of an<br />

aquifer is proportional to the hydraulic gradient (slope<br />

of the piezometric surface) and the coefficient of transmissibility,<br />

and it can be computed by us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

modified form of the Darcy equation (see Ferris,<br />

1959).<br />

where:<br />

Q = T<strong>IL</strong> (10)<br />

Q = discharge through flow cross section, <strong>in</strong> gpd<br />

T = coefficient of transmissibility, <strong>in</strong> gpd/ft<br />

I = hydraulic gradient, <strong>in</strong> ft/mi<br />

L = width of flow cross section, <strong>in</strong> mi<br />

The rate of recharge directly from precipitation can be<br />

estimated on the basis of the difference <strong>in</strong> discharge of<br />

<strong>water</strong> through successive flow cross sections with the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g equation (Walton, 1962):<br />

where:<br />

(11)<br />

The + sign is used when there is a <strong>water</strong>-level rise and<br />

the — sign is used when there is a <strong>water</strong>-level decl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Flow l<strong>in</strong>es were drawn at right angles to the estimated<br />

piezometric surface contours for December 1956,<br />

June 1961, and June 1962 toward cones of depression<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Wood River, Granite City, National City, and<br />

Monsanto <strong>area</strong>s to delimit the flow channels <strong>in</strong> figures<br />

52 through 54. The locations of flow channels were so<br />

chosen that recharge rates under all types of geologic,<br />

hydrologic, and land use conditions could be studied.<br />

The discharges through cross sections A—A', B—B',<br />

C—C', D—D', E—E', F—F', G—G', and H—H' were<br />

computed us<strong>in</strong>g equation 10 and figures 25 and 52<br />

through 54. Differences <strong>in</strong> discharge of <strong>water</strong> through<br />

successive flow cross sections were determ<strong>in</strong>ed. Average<br />

rates of <strong>water</strong>-level decl<strong>in</strong>es or rises with<strong>in</strong> flow channel<br />

<strong>area</strong>s were estimated from hydrographs of observation<br />

wells. Surface <strong>area</strong>s of flow channels were obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from figures 52 through 54. The average coefficient of<br />

storage of the coarser deposits was estimated to be 0.20<br />

on the basis of aquifer-test data, and the average coefficient<br />

of storage of the f<strong>in</strong>er gra<strong>in</strong>ed alluvium was estimated<br />

to be 0.10 on the basis of studies by Schicht and<br />

Walton (1961). The data mentioned above were substituted<br />

<strong>in</strong> equation 11, and recharge rates for each flow<br />

channel <strong>area</strong> were computed.<br />

Recharge rates vary from 299,000 gpd/sq mi <strong>in</strong> the<br />

National City <strong>area</strong> to 475,000 gpd/sq mi <strong>in</strong> the Wood<br />

River <strong>area</strong>. The average rate of recharge <strong>in</strong> the <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong> is 371,000 gpd/sq mi. The <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong><br />

covers about 175 square miles. It is estimated that total<br />

recharge directly from precipitation to the <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong> averages about 65 mgd.<br />

The subsurface flow of <strong>water</strong> from the bluff was<br />

estimated by study<strong>in</strong>g the movement of <strong>water</strong> through<br />

flow channels near the foot of the bluff. Flow l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />

drawn at right angles to the bluff and the estimated<br />

piezometric surface contours for June 1961 and June<br />

1962 to delimit the flow channels shown <strong>in</strong> figures 53 and<br />

54. The discharge through cross sections I—I', J—J',<br />

and K—K' were computed us<strong>in</strong>g equation 10 and figures<br />

25, 53, and 54. Average rates of <strong>water</strong>-level decl<strong>in</strong>es or<br />

rises with<strong>in</strong> flow channel <strong>area</strong>s were estimated from<br />

hydrographs of observation wells. The average rates of<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> storage with<strong>in</strong> flow channel <strong>area</strong>s were computed<br />

as the products of <strong>water</strong>-level changes, storage coefficients,<br />

and flow channel <strong>area</strong>s. Recharge directly from<br />

precipitation with<strong>in</strong> flow channel <strong>area</strong>s was estimated as<br />

the products of the average recharge rate (371,000<br />

gpd/sq mi) and flow channel <strong>area</strong>s. Recharge and<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> storage with<strong>in</strong> flow channel <strong>area</strong>s were subtracted<br />

from the discharges through cross sections I—I',<br />

J—J', and K—K' to compute rates of subsurface flow of<br />

<strong>water</strong> from the bluff. The average rate of subsurface flow<br />

of <strong>water</strong> from the bluff is 329,000 gpd/mi. The length of<br />

the bluff form<strong>in</strong>g the eastern boundary of the <strong>East</strong> <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Louis</strong> <strong>area</strong> is 39 miles. Thus, the total rate of subsurface<br />

flow of <strong>water</strong> from the bluffs is about 12.8 mgd.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!