School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Introduction<br />
2 Introduction<br />
Like humans <strong>and</strong> animals, plants are affected by a broad range <strong>of</strong> pathogenic<br />
microorganisms. Despite expensive pest control measure, infectious plant<br />
diseases significantly interfere with crop production. It is estimated that they<br />
diminish the attainable overall production by approximately 14% while another<br />
6-12% <strong>of</strong> the actual harvest are lost due to post-harvest diseases (Agrios,<br />
2005). These losses differ between crop varieties <strong>and</strong> climatic regions, but in<br />
general their percentage is higher in developing countries as compared to the<br />
industrialized world (Oerke et al., 1994). Worldwide, approximately 35 billion<br />
US Dollars are spent on chemicals for plant protection per year (Agrios, 2005).<br />
The high losses (equaling a value <strong>of</strong> more than 220 billion US Dollar) in spite <strong>of</strong><br />
this expenses have various reasons. Increased worldwide trading <strong>and</strong> traveling<br />
brings about a fast distribution <strong>of</strong> foreign pathogens to new regions. For<br />
example, the fire blight pathogen E. amylovora was supposed to be indigenous<br />
to North America, but it has been spreading all over Europe by now (Eastgate,<br />
2000). Monocultures grown over large areas favor epidemical spread <strong>of</strong><br />
pathogens, while the continued use <strong>of</strong> pesticides <strong>and</strong> fungicides to suppress<br />
such outbreaks promotes the occurrence <strong>of</strong> resistant pathogens (Baker et al.,<br />
1997; McManus et al., 2002). Resistance traits from plant pathogenic bacteria<br />
can be transmitted to human pathogens, so the use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics in agriculture<br />
is largely restricted (McManus et al., 2002; Teuber, 1999). Many other agrichemicals<br />
have been proven to cause environmental damage, <strong>and</strong><br />
consequently have been prohibited. Growing public concern on side effects <strong>of</strong><br />
pesticides led to a revision <strong>of</strong> European commission directive 91/414/CEE<br />
regulating safety requirements <strong>and</strong> accreditation <strong>of</strong> plant protection products.<br />
The alteration <strong>of</strong> this directive in 2002 resulted in the direct withdrawal <strong>of</strong> 320<br />
substances from the European market while at the same time the legal status<br />
<strong>of</strong> another 150 products became questionable (European Commission press<br />
release, 2002). As these 470 products equal 60% <strong>of</strong> all plant protection<br />
products previously available, the need for alternatives becomes most obvious.<br />
2