School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction<br />
The relationship between plants <strong>and</strong> epiphytic microorganism is understood to<br />
a much lesser extent. One well-characterized feature is the correlation between<br />
root exudates <strong>and</strong> the high number <strong>of</strong> microorganisms associated to the<br />
rhizosphere. By this mechanism plants are able to recruit biocontrol agents,<br />
according to the type <strong>of</strong> pathogen that threatens the plant (Weller et al., 2002).<br />
An example for this is the frequently observed spontaneous decline <strong>of</strong> take-all<br />
disease. Take-all disease <strong>of</strong> wheat is caused by the fungus<br />
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici which results (as the name implies) in<br />
disastrous losses. The take-all decline is defined as the spontaneous decrease<br />
in the incidence <strong>and</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> take-all that occurs with monoculture <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
or other susceptible host crops after one or more severe outbreaks <strong>of</strong> the<br />
disease (Mazzola, 2002). It was observed many times in different locations all<br />
over the world <strong>and</strong> has been correlated to 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG)-<br />
producing bacteria (Keel et al., 1996). The relative abundance <strong>of</strong> DAPG<br />
producers in the wheat rhizosphere increases significantly during take-all<br />
disease, while it does not increase if the pathogen is absent. Furthermore, a<br />
temporal break in monocultures <strong>of</strong> wheat by a non-susceptible crop leads to a<br />
decrease in DAPG producer populations <strong>and</strong> a loss <strong>of</strong> take-all suppression by<br />
the respective soil. This stresses the active part <strong>of</strong> the host plant in supporting<br />
the biocontrol agent (Mazzola, 2002; Weller et al., 2002).<br />
Rhizobacteria can actively support the growth <strong>of</strong> their host plants. The<br />
respective group <strong>of</strong> bacteria is called plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria<br />
(PGPR). They produce plant hormones that influence root morphogenesis <strong>and</strong><br />
result in the overproduction <strong>of</strong> root hairs <strong>and</strong> lateral roots. The subsequent<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> ion uptake accompanied by enhanced solubilisation <strong>of</strong> this ions due<br />
to microbial activity results in enhanced plant nourishment <strong>and</strong> subsequently in<br />
better plant health <strong>and</strong> growth (Persello-Cartieaux et al., 2003; Schippers et al.,<br />
1987). Screening <strong>of</strong> PGNRs for biological control abilities revealed an<br />
interesting new mechanism <strong>of</strong> induced plant resistance. Some PGNRs induce a<br />
plant defense reaction similar to SAR. This so-called induced systemic<br />
8