12.03.2014 Views

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.7.3 No Action<br />

F-<strong>22</strong> <strong>Plus</strong>-<strong>Up</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

4.0 <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Under the No Action Alternative, existing military flight training would continue, and cultural<br />

resources would continue to be managed in compliance with federal law and Air Force<br />

regulations.<br />

4.8 Land Use, Transportation, and Recreation<br />

Land uses are established on JBER and on the periphery of JBER. The Municipality of<br />

Anchorage is south and west of the base, waters of the Knik Arm of the Cook Inlet are located<br />

west and north of the base and private and state lands are to the east and south east. In most<br />

areas, off-base land use is not affected by activities at JBER. As described in Chapter 2.0, the key<br />

elements of the proposal are flight activities and personnel changes. Established and<br />

recognized noise models have been applied to estimate the off-base and on-base noise<br />

conditions. These models are described in Appendix D. For the land use and transportation<br />

resources, consequences are associated with increases in noise due to an increase in sorties.<br />

Potential effects to land use plans, land use patterns and circulation due to personnel increases<br />

are considered.<br />

4.8.1 <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Under the Proposed Action, the total geographic area exposed to 65 dB L dn or more is presented<br />

on Figure 4.2-2 and quantified in Table 4.2-1. The off-base area consists of an additional 6.6<br />

acres over the Port of Anchorage, 410.7 acres over water of the Knik Arm, and 0.2 acre of land<br />

west of the Knik Arm. Some areas on base would also experience higher noise levels. These<br />

changes in the noise environment would not result in changes to land management, land use, or<br />

land ownership, nor would there be any changes to the safety zones.<br />

The DoD and FAA adopted the concept of land use compatibility as an accepted measure of<br />

aircraft noise effect. USEPA has reaffirmed these concepts (see Appendix D). The FAA has<br />

guidelines that establish the best means for determining noise impact in airport communities.<br />

Industrial land uses, such as ports, are compatible within the 65 dB L dn noise contours.<br />

The JBER-<strong>Elmendorf</strong> noise abatement program precludes flight operations between 10 p.m. and<br />

7 a.m., except for national emergency or infrequent large scale exercises. This program reduces<br />

the potential for noise impacts upon land uses and helps define the 65 dB L dn contours.<br />

Although the additional F-<strong>22</strong> operations would produce an increase in noise exposure within<br />

the base boundaries and over compatible land uses, that increase should not result in changes to<br />

land use or land ownership.<br />

A less than one percent increase in on-base employment is likely to slightly increase vehicle<br />

trips in the long term. The negligible increase in traffic is not likely to substantially affect<br />

commute times.<br />

Recreational activities on JBER are extensive and seasonally variable. On-base recreation<br />

reflects the off-base recreation available to residents of Anchorage and neighboring<br />

Page 4-18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!