12.03.2014 Views

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F-<strong>22</strong> <strong>Plus</strong>-<strong>Up</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

4.0 <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

discernable, and a detectible increase in sonic booms could result in annoyance, but would not<br />

be expected to affect land used for subsistence activities.<br />

4.8.3 No Action<br />

Under the No Action Alternative the Air Force would continue to fly F-<strong>22</strong> aircraft at JBER-<br />

<strong>Elmendorf</strong> and train in existing Alaska SUA. As with the proposed action, no consequences<br />

associated with aircraft overflights and aircraft noise to special land use or recreational areas<br />

would be anticipated.<br />

4.9 Socioeconomics<br />

The F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up would require personnel to operate and maintain the additional six primary<br />

aircraft and provide necessary support services.<br />

4.9.1 <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Existing population and employment characteristics in Anchorage were analyzed to assess the<br />

potential socioeconomic impacts of the proposed beddown, as presented in Section 3.9.2. The<br />

Proposed Action involves adding 103 Air Force personnel to support the additional six F-<strong>22</strong><br />

primary aircraft. This represents less than one percent of JBER employment. The addition of<br />

any personnel is a positive element to the regional economy although the relative change in<br />

JBER employment would not discernibly affect the regional economy.<br />

Socioeconomic impacts would occur if changes associated with the plus-up substantially<br />

affected demand for housing or community services, such as schools, or substantially affected<br />

economic stability in the region. The potential population, employment, income, and output<br />

associated with an addition of less than one percent of base personnel and no new construction<br />

would have no measurable effect upon services, schools, or the regional economy.<br />

The Air Force makes on-base housing available for military personnel. No additional on-base<br />

housing would be available for the increase of 103 personnel and their dependents. The<br />

Anchorage housing market with approximately 6,700 vacant units and a 6.0 percent vacancy<br />

rate would be expected to easily absorb the additional 103 personnel.<br />

4.9.2 Training Airspace <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

A number of Alaska Native villages and traditional subsistence areas underlie Alaskan SUA.<br />

The local economy in many of these villages is stimulated by subsistence activities. The<br />

proposed increase in training operations from six additional F-<strong>22</strong> aircraft would increase the<br />

number of F-<strong>22</strong> overflights, although the total fighter activity would have somewhat fewer<br />

overflights as occurred prior to the relocation of the F-15C aircraft in 2010. The additional F-<strong>22</strong><br />

training would not be expected to discernibly affect annual average noise levels under the<br />

training airspace.<br />

The single exception is in the area of sonic booms. Training F-<strong>22</strong> aircraft fly at supersonic speed<br />

an estimated 25 to 30 percent of its training mission. Although the F-<strong>22</strong> flies at high altitude and<br />

Page 4-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!