F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...
F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...
F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
F-<strong>22</strong> <strong>Plus</strong>-<strong>Up</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
5.0 Cumulative Impacts<br />
and ongoing military action in the region were considered as part of the baseline or existing<br />
condition in Chapter 3.<br />
5.1.1.1 <strong>Elmendorf</strong> AFB, Fort Richardson, Other Military Actions, and the<br />
Establishment of JBER<br />
<strong>Elmendorf</strong> AFB and Fort Richardson, separately and jointly, were active military installations<br />
that experienced continuous and rapid evolution of mission and training requirements. This<br />
process of change is consistent with the U.S. defense policy that the United States Military<br />
Forces must be ready to respond to threats to American interest throughout the world. The two<br />
bases were combined into JBER in 2010 and will continue to experience changes in mission and<br />
training requirements.<br />
The combined base, like other major military installations, regularly requires new construction,<br />
facility improvements, and infrastructure upgrades. In addition, Table 5.1-1 lists past, present,<br />
and potential future major military projects occurring in the region. Each project was reviewed<br />
to consider the implication of each action and its synergy with the proposed F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up. Of<br />
particular interest were potential overlap in affected area and project timing. The projects listed<br />
on Table 5.1-1 have the potential to interact in time or location with the proposed F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up.<br />
The relocation of three F-15 aircraft squadrons, the beddown of C-17 aircraft, BRAC decisions<br />
regarding C-130 aircraft, proposed transportation projects, and other regional projects were<br />
cumulatively evaluated. As JBER combines administrative, air, and ground activities over the<br />
next few years, there could be a desire to assess such combined efforts in a future<br />
environmental analysis. Such a future analysis, should it occur, would address all JBER<br />
activities. No significant environmental consequences would cumulatively result from<br />
preparation of an undefined separate environmental analysis not directly related or connected<br />
with the F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up EA.<br />
5.1.1.2 Non-Federal Actions<br />
Non-federal actions include major public and private projects within the ROI. The Municipality<br />
of Anchorage is a large urban area with multiple construction projects occurring, especially in<br />
the summer months. Specific major actions within the vicinity of JBER are summarized in Table<br />
5.1-2. The projects listed on Table 5.1-2 have the potential to interact in time or location with the<br />
proposed F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up.<br />
5.1.2 Cumulative Effects Analysis<br />
5.1.2.1 Airspace Management and Air Traffic Control<br />
This EA addresses the JBER cumulative airspace effects by incorporating all existing and plus-up<br />
F-<strong>22</strong>s, C-17s, C-130s, helicopters, and other aircraft at JBER along with the outgoing F-15s. The net<br />
effect is an estimated overall reduction in JBER flight operations by jet fighters over the past five<br />
years. The change in flight operations does not substantially change JBER tower responsibility.<br />
These actions do not substantially affect the AATA management of Anchorage airspace.<br />
Page 5-2