12.03.2014 Views

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

F-22 Plus-Up Environmental Assessment - Joint Base Elmendorf ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F-<strong>22</strong> <strong>Plus</strong>-<strong>Up</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

5.0 Cumulative Impacts<br />

and ongoing military action in the region were considered as part of the baseline or existing<br />

condition in Chapter 3.<br />

5.1.1.1 <strong>Elmendorf</strong> AFB, Fort Richardson, Other Military Actions, and the<br />

Establishment of JBER<br />

<strong>Elmendorf</strong> AFB and Fort Richardson, separately and jointly, were active military installations<br />

that experienced continuous and rapid evolution of mission and training requirements. This<br />

process of change is consistent with the U.S. defense policy that the United States Military<br />

Forces must be ready to respond to threats to American interest throughout the world. The two<br />

bases were combined into JBER in 2010 and will continue to experience changes in mission and<br />

training requirements.<br />

The combined base, like other major military installations, regularly requires new construction,<br />

facility improvements, and infrastructure upgrades. In addition, Table 5.1-1 lists past, present,<br />

and potential future major military projects occurring in the region. Each project was reviewed<br />

to consider the implication of each action and its synergy with the proposed F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up. Of<br />

particular interest were potential overlap in affected area and project timing. The projects listed<br />

on Table 5.1-1 have the potential to interact in time or location with the proposed F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up.<br />

The relocation of three F-15 aircraft squadrons, the beddown of C-17 aircraft, BRAC decisions<br />

regarding C-130 aircraft, proposed transportation projects, and other regional projects were<br />

cumulatively evaluated. As JBER combines administrative, air, and ground activities over the<br />

next few years, there could be a desire to assess such combined efforts in a future<br />

environmental analysis. Such a future analysis, should it occur, would address all JBER<br />

activities. No significant environmental consequences would cumulatively result from<br />

preparation of an undefined separate environmental analysis not directly related or connected<br />

with the F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up EA.<br />

5.1.1.2 Non-Federal Actions<br />

Non-federal actions include major public and private projects within the ROI. The Municipality<br />

of Anchorage is a large urban area with multiple construction projects occurring, especially in<br />

the summer months. Specific major actions within the vicinity of JBER are summarized in Table<br />

5.1-2. The projects listed on Table 5.1-2 have the potential to interact in time or location with the<br />

proposed F-<strong>22</strong> plus-up.<br />

5.1.2 Cumulative Effects Analysis<br />

5.1.2.1 Airspace Management and Air Traffic Control<br />

This EA addresses the JBER cumulative airspace effects by incorporating all existing and plus-up<br />

F-<strong>22</strong>s, C-17s, C-130s, helicopters, and other aircraft at JBER along with the outgoing F-15s. The net<br />

effect is an estimated overall reduction in JBER flight operations by jet fighters over the past five<br />

years. The change in flight operations does not substantially change JBER tower responsibility.<br />

These actions do not substantially affect the AATA management of Anchorage airspace.<br />

Page 5-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!