TITRE Adaptive Packet Video Streaming Over IP Networks - LaBRI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[24] ISO/IEC 14496-3 “Coding of audio-visual objects, Part 3: Audio”, final committee draft, May 1998. [25] ITU-T Rec. H.264 | ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC, “Study of Final Committee Draft of Joint Video Specification”, February 2003. [26] P. Amon, G. Bäse, K. Illgner, and J. Pandel, “Efficient Coding of Synchronized H.26L Streams”, ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG), document VCEG-N35, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, September 2001. [27] N. Kamaci, Y. Altunbask, “Performance comparison of the emerging H.264 video coding standard with the existing standards”, in IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia and Expo, ICME’03, Baltimore, MD, July 2003. [28] S. Wenger, M.M. Hannuksela, T. Stockhammer, M. Westerlund, and D. Singer, “RTP payload Format for H.264 Video”, Internet Draft, IETF, June 2003, Expires December 2003. [29] Windows Media Home Page, available at: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/ [30] Real Video Home Page, available at : http://www.realnetworks.com/solutions/leadership/realvideo.html [31] K. Shen and E. J. Delp, “Wavelet base rate scalable video compression”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 9, pp. 109–121, 1999. [32] J. M. Shapiro, “Embedded image coding using zero tree of wavelet coefficients”, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 41, pp. 3445–3462, 1993. [33] I. Sodagar, H.-J. Lee, P. Hatrack, and Y.-Q. Zhang, “Scalable wavelet coding for synthetic/natural hybrid images”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 9, pp. 244– 254, 1999. [34] J.-Y. Tham, S. Ranganath, and A. A. Kassim, “Highly scalable wavelet based video codec for very low bit-rate environment”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 16, pp. 12–27, 1998. [35] S. Wenger, “Video Redundancy Coding in H.263+”, Workshop on Audio-Visual Services for Packet Networks, September 1997. [36] V. Vaishampayan and S. John, “Interframe balanced-multiple description video compression”, IEEE Inter Conf. on Image Processing, Oct.1999. [37] A. Reibman, H. Jafarkhani, Y. Wang, M. Orchard, and R. Puri, “Multiple description coding for video using motion compensated prediction”, IEEE Inter. Conf. Image Processing , October 1999. [38] J. Apostolopoulos, “Error-resilient video compression via multiple state streams”, In Proc. International Workshop on Very Low Bitrate VideoCoding (VLBV'99), October 1999. [39] J. Apostolopoulos and S. Wee, “Unbalanced Multiple Description Video Communication Using Path Diversity”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, October 2001. [40] W. Li, “Overview of Fine Granularity Scalability in MPEG-4 video standard,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 11, no. 3 , pp. 301-317, Mar. 2001. [41] F. Ling,W. Li, and H.-Q. Sun, “Bitplane coding of DCT coefficients for image and video compression”, in Proc. SPIE-VCIP’99, San Jose, CA, Jan. 25–27, 1999, pp. 500–508. [42] W. Li, “Bitplane coding of DCT coefficients for fine granularity scalability”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/M3989, Oct. 1998. 160
[43] B. Schuster, “Fine granular scalability with wavelets coding”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/M4021, Oct. 1998. [44] Y.-W. Chen, H. Radha, and R. A. Cohen, “Results of experiment of fine granular scalability with wavelet encoding of residuals,”, SO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/M3988, Oct. 1998. [45] J. Liang, J. Yu, Y.Wang, M. Srinath, and M.-H. Zhou, “Fine granularity scalable video coding using combination of MPEG4 video objects and still texture objects,”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/M4025, Oct. 1998. [46] S. C. S. Cheung and A. Zakhor, “Matching pursuit coding for fine granular video scalability”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/M3991, Oct. 1998. [47] M. Benetiere and C. Dufour, “Matching pursuits residual coding for video fine granular scalability”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/M4008, Oct. 1998. [48] J. Macnicol, M. Frater, and J. Arnold, “Results on fine granularity scalability”, Melbourne, Australia, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG99/m5122, Oct. 1999. [49] F. Wu, S. Li and Y.-Q. Zhang, “A framework for efficient progressive fine granularity scalable video coding,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, special issue on streaming video, Vol. 11, no 3, 332-344, 2001. [50] X. Sun, F. Wu, S. Li, W. Gao, and Y,-Q. Zhang, “Macroblock-based progressive fine granularity scalable video coding”, ICME2001, Tokyo, Aug. 22-25, 2001. [51] S. Li, F. Wu, and Y. Q. Zhang, “Study of a new approach to improve FGS video coding efficiency”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG98/M5583, Dec. 1999. [52] J. Hartung, A. Jacquin, J. Pawlyk, and K. L. Shipley, “A real-time scalable software video codec for collaborative applications over packed networks,” in Proc ACM Multimedia’98, Bristol, U.K., Sept. 1998, pp. 419–426. [53] P. Amon, K. Illgner, and J. Pandel, “SNR Scalable Layered Video Coding”, International Packet Video Workshop 2002, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, April 2002. [54] K. Illgner, P. Amon, J. Pandel, and M. Wagner, “Scalable Video Coding and Resilient Transmission over IP”, 2002 Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications (IWDC 2002), Capri, Italy, September 2002. [55] S.E. Han and B. Girod, “Robust and Efficient Scalable Video Coding with Leaky Prediction”, In International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2002), Rochester, NY, USA, September 2002. [56] Y. He, R. Yan, F. Wu, and S. Li, “H.26L-based Fine Granularity Scalable Video Coding”, ITU- T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG), document VCEG-O60, Pattaya, Thailand, Decembe 2001. [57] R. Yan, F. Wu, S. Li, and Y.Q. Zhang, “Macroblock-based Progressive Fine Granularity Spatial Scalability (mb-PFGSS)”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG2001/M7112, March 2001. [58] S. McCanne and V. Jacobson, “Receiver-driven layered multicast”, in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM’96, Stanford, CA, pp. 117–130, Aug. 1996. [59] P. Amon, and J. Pandel “Evaluation of Adaptive and Reliable Video Transmission Technologies”, Packet Video’03, France, April 2003. [60] X. Sun, S. Li, F. Wu, G. Shen, and W. Gao, “Efficient and flexible drift-free video bitstream switching at predictive frames”, ICME 2002. 161
Page 1:
UNIVERSITÉ DE VERSAILLES SAINT-QUE
Page 4 and 5:
Résumé Nous constatons aujourd’
Page 6 and 7:
3 Related Work ....................
Page 8 and 9:
5.5.1.2 Simulation Results.........
Page 10 and 11:
List of Figures Figure 1-1: Structu
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 5-15: End-to-end packet tran
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgments The first person I
Page 16 and 17:
[11] Toufik Ahmed, Guillaume Burida
Page 18 and 19:
d’accès. Les interactions de QoS
Page 20 and 21:
Métrique MAX_DELAY PREF_MAX_DELAY
Page 22 and 23:
1.1.2 Proposition dun Protocole d'E
Page 24 and 25:
des paquets RTP. Reste toujours le
Page 26 and 27:
Nous pouvons distinguer trois possi
Page 28 and 29:
1.1.2.5.2 Multiplexage des Flux El
Page 30 and 31:
l’horloge est par défaut égale
Page 32 and 33:
La valeur R TCP représente le déb
Page 34 and 35:
Pour ces raisons, nous nous intére
Page 36 and 37:
Telles que illustrés par la Figure
Page 38 and 39:
3. DMIF2SIP vérifie si son propre
Page 40 and 41:
utilisée optionnellement pour loca
Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 2 2 Introduction 2.1 Motiva
Page 44 and 45:
conditions. Based on end-to-end fee
Page 46 and 47:
Chapter 3 3 Related Work Nowadays,
Page 48 and 49:
• multicasting: it takes the stre
Page 50 and 51:
expensive, fixed delivery and recep
Page 52 and 53:
3.1.6 Static vs. Dynamic Channels T
Page 54 and 55:
environment because they require a
Page 56 and 57:
H.261 is called video codec for aud
Page 58 and 59:
VideoScene (VS) VideoObject (VO) Vi
Page 60 and 61:
The emphasis of MPEG-7 will be the
Page 62 and 63:
Temporal scalability involves parti
Page 64 and 65:
multitude of streams. It can switch
Page 66 and 67:
increased linearly in the absence o
Page 68 and 69:
3.2.2.1 End-to-End Retransmission R
Page 70 and 71:
correctly received block. The missi
Page 72 and 73:
epresent user traffic. The delay ca
Page 74 and 75:
3.2.5 IP Signaling Protocols for Pa
Page 76 and 77:
two H.323 endpoints or between an e
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 4 4 Adaptive Packet Video T
Page 81 and 82:
4.1.1 Video Classification Model Pr
Page 83 and 84:
attributes can refer to the QoS par
Page 85 and 86:
In RBF, 2 D = X − is the distance
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 4-6: Experiment testbed In t
Page 89 and 90:
190 180 170 End-to-end delay MPEG-4
Page 91 and 92:
Sync Layer. The SL-packetized strea
Page 93 and 94:
conveyed by MIME format parameters
Page 95 and 96:
the same value. This timing informa
Page 97 and 98:
4.2.2.1 Fragmentation We propose to
Page 99 and 100:
Timestamp: Indicates the sampling i
Page 101 and 102:
When G is used as generator matrix,
Page 103 and 104:
4.2.3 Performance Evaluation Intens
Page 105 and 106:
0.3 0.25 our proposal classical app
Page 107 and 108:
lost packet at the receiver. Conseq
Page 109 and 110:
marking scheme. The server must be
Page 111 and 112:
The video server adds audio-visual
Page 113 and 114:
Marker (TR3CM) [131] to mark the ba
Page 115 and 116:
VO1 VO2 AVO Scenario Audio BL EL1 E
Page 117 and 118:
Throughput (Kbits) 3000 2500 2000 1
Page 119 and 120:
Throughput (Kbits) 3000 2500 2000 1
Page 121 and 122:
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000
Page 123 and 124:
45 40 Original Quality Received Qua
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 5 5 A Dynamic Packet Video
Page 127 and 128: The TCM algorithm is based on a tok
Page 129 and 130: BEGIN Initialize the classification
Page 131 and 132: User Profile (Token Bucket) Traffic
Page 133 and 134: 5.3.3 QoS Management Algorithm Spec
Page 135 and 136: Figure 5-7: Hierarchical aggregatio
Page 137 and 138: • Filters: to put packets into cl
Page 139 and 140: mechanism associated with the Drop
Page 141 and 142: Figure 5-16: Packets loss with IP D
Page 143 and 144: 5.5.2.3 Experimental Results Figure
Page 145 and 146: 1 MPEG-4 Based Layer Stream -AF11 M
Page 147 and 148: 0.2 0.18 MPEG-4 Based Layer Stream
Page 149 and 150: By using our PBNM tool, we allocate
Page 151 and 152: Id Condition Indicator Action 1 Net
Page 153 and 154: The proposed marking algorithm bett
Page 155 and 156: Chapter 6 6 A SIP/MPEG-4 Multimedia
Page 157 and 158: performed by many ways like SLA (Se
Page 159 and 160: 6.1.1.4 SIP Communication Model SIP
Page 161 and 162: • It assign a value (network sess
Page 163 and 164: 6.2.1 SIP2DMIF Subsystem The SIP2DM
Page 165 and 166: Step 1: The MPEG-4 Terminal passes
Page 167 and 168: 1. Set the result C to the empty se
Page 169 and 170: TCP/UDP port, our implementation us
Page 171 and 172: Control & Data Plan Video Rate Cont
Page 173 and 174: characteristics and relevance of ea
Page 175: References [1] Kazaa Media Desktop
Page 179 and 180: [79] D. Bansal and H. Balakrishnan,
Page 181 and 182: [115] N. Laoutaris, I. Stavrakakis,
Page 183 and 184: [154] W. Almesberger, J. H. Salim,
Page 185 and 186: Appendix A A Appendix A: Overview o
Page 187 and 188: Media aware Delivery unaware ISO/IE
Page 189 and 190: A.3.3 Scene Description Streams Sce
Page 191: This appendix presents structure ex
show all

TITRE Adaptive Packet Video Streaming Over IP Networks - LaBRI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?