TITRE Adaptive Packet Video Streaming Over IP Networks - LaBRI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[134] Huai-Rong, Wenwu, and Ya-Qin Zhang, “Scalable Object-Based Video Multicasting Over The Internet. International Conference on Image Processing”, September 2000. [135] E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, and R. Callon, “RFC: 3031 Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture”, Request for Comments, IETF, January 2001. [136] R. Braden, et al. “RFC: 2205 Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)”, Request for Comments, IETF, Sep. 1997. [137] D. Durham, Ed., J. Boyle, R. Cohen, S. Herzog, R. Rajan, A. Sastry, “RFC: 2748 The COPS (Common Open Policy Service) Protocol”, Request for Comments, IETF, January 2000. [138] S. Herzog, Ed., J. Boyle, R. Cohen, D. Durham, R. Rajan, A. Sastry, “RFC: 2749 COPS usage for RSVP”, Request for Comments, IETF, January 2000. [139] K. Chan, J. Seligson, D. Durham, S. Gai, K. McCloghrie, S. Herzog, F. Reichmeyer, R. Yavatkar, A. Smith “RFC: 3084 COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)”, Request for Comments, IETF, March 2001. [140] M. Handley H. Schulzrinne, E. Schooler J. Rosenberg “RFC: 2543 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)”, Request for Comments, IETF, Mar. 1999. [141] M. Handley, V. Jacobson, “RFC: 2327 SDP Session Description Protocol”, Request for Comments, IETF, Apr. 1998. [142] IUT-T Recommendation H.323 (11/96), “Visual telephone systems and equipment for local area networks which provide a non guaranteed quality of service”, Nov. 1996. [143] IUT-T Recommendation H.323 Draft v4 (11/2000), “Packet-based multimedia communications systems”, Nov. 2000. [144] ISO/IEC 14496-6, “Coding of audio-visual objects -- Part 6: Delivery Multimedia Integration Framework (DMIF) final committee draft”, May 1998. [145] H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier, “RFC: 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)”, Request for Comments, IETF, April 1998. [146] Media Gateway Control (megaco) Working group available at: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/megaco-charter.html [147] M. Handley, C. Perkins, E. Whelan, “RFC: 2974 Session Announcement Protocol”, Request for Comments, IETF, Oct. 2000. [148] J. Rosenberg, Schulzrinne “RFC: 2871 A Framework for Telephony Routing over IP”, Request for Comments, IETF, Jun. 2000. [149] S. Iyer, R.R. Kompella, and A. Shelat “ClassiPI: An Architecture for Fast and Flexible Packet Classification”, IEEE Network special issue on Fast IP Packet Forwarding and Classification for Next Generation Internet Services (March-April 2001). [150] Pankaj Gupta and Nick McKeown “Algorithms for Packet Classification”, IEEE Network Special Issue, vol. 15, no. 2, pp 24-32, (March /April 2001). [151] D. Heckerman et al. “Real-World Applications of Bayesian Networks”, Communications of the ACM volume 38 (1995). [152] ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, “MPEG-7 overview,” N4980, July 2002 [153] Werner Almesberger: Differentiated Services on Linux Home Page http://icawww1.epfl.ch/linux-Diffserv/ 166
[154] W. Almesberger, J. H. Salim, A. Kuznetsov: “Differentiated Services on Linux”. Work in progress. (June 1999). [155] ITU-T Recommendation Y.1541 “Internet Protocol Communication Service – IP Performance and Availability Objectives and Allocations”, (Oct 2001). [156] K. Yoshihiro al., " RFC: 3016 RTP Payload Format for MPEG-4 Audio/Visual Streams", the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), November 2000. [157] Basso, Civanlar, P. Gentric, Herpel, Lifshitz, Lim, Perkins, Van Der Meer, "RTP Payload Format for MPEG-4 Streams", the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), July 20, 2001, work in progress, expires January 2002. [158] D.Curet, E.Gouleau, S.Relier, C.Roux, P.Clement, G.Cherry; “RTP Payload Format for MPEG-4 FlexMultiplexed Streams”, Internet Draft ,IETF, Work in progress, November, 8 2001. [159] J. Van Der Meer, D. Mackie, V. Swaminathan, D. Singer, P. Gentric, “RTP Payload Format for Transport of MPEG-4 Elementary Streams”, Internet Draft ,IETF, draft-ietf-avt-mpeg4- simple-08.txt, Work in progress, August 2003, Expires February 2004. [160] C.Guillemot, P.Christ, S.Wesner, and A. Klemets, , “RTP Payload Format for MPEG-4 with Flexible Error Resiliency”, Internet draft, IETF, Work in progress, Mars 2000. [161] A. Klemets, “Common Generic RTP Payload Format”, draft-klemets generic-rtp-00, March 13, 1998. [162] T. Ahmed, G. Buridant and A. Mehaoua, “Encapsulation and Marking of MPEG-4 Video over IP Differentiated Services”, in Proc. Of IEEE ISCC 01, pp. 346-352, July 2001. [163] A. Nafaa, T. Ahmed, Y. Hadjadj Aoul, and A. Mehaoua “Rtp4mux: A Novel MPEG-4 Rtp Payload For Multicast Video Communications Over Wireless IP” in Proc. Of Packet Video PV’2003, April 28-29, April 2003. [164] S. Floyd, , V. Jacobson, “Link-sharing and Resource Management Models for Packet Networks”, in proc. of IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 365-386, August 1995. [165] David D. Clark and Wenjia Fang, “Explicit Allocation of Best Effort Packet Delivery Service”, ACM Transactions on Networking, pp.362-373, August 1998. [166] S. Floyd and V. Jacobson “Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 397-413, August 1993. [167] S. Floyd, and K. Fall “Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control in the Internet” Proc. of IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, 7(4), pp.458-472, August 1999. [168] A. Albanese, J. Bloemer, J. Edmonds, M. Luby, and M. Sudan, “Priority Encoding Transmission”, IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory 42, pp. 1737-1747, Nov. 1996. [169] J. Stuart Hunter. “The Exponentially Weighted Moving Average” J Quality Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 203-207, 1986. 167
Page 1:
UNIVERSITÉ DE VERSAILLES SAINT-QUE
Page 4 and 5:
Résumé Nous constatons aujourd’
Page 6 and 7:
3 Related Work ....................
Page 8 and 9:
5.5.1.2 Simulation Results.........
Page 10 and 11:
List of Figures Figure 1-1: Structu
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 5-15: End-to-end packet tran
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgments The first person I
Page 16 and 17:
[11] Toufik Ahmed, Guillaume Burida
Page 18 and 19:
d’accès. Les interactions de QoS
Page 20 and 21:
Métrique MAX_DELAY PREF_MAX_DELAY
Page 22 and 23:
1.1.2 Proposition dun Protocole d'E
Page 24 and 25:
des paquets RTP. Reste toujours le
Page 26 and 27:
Nous pouvons distinguer trois possi
Page 28 and 29:
1.1.2.5.2 Multiplexage des Flux El
Page 30 and 31:
l’horloge est par défaut égale
Page 32 and 33:
La valeur R TCP représente le déb
Page 34 and 35:
Pour ces raisons, nous nous intére
Page 36 and 37:
Telles que illustrés par la Figure
Page 38 and 39:
3. DMIF2SIP vérifie si son propre
Page 40 and 41:
utilisée optionnellement pour loca
Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 2 2 Introduction 2.1 Motiva
Page 44 and 45:
conditions. Based on end-to-end fee
Page 46 and 47:
Chapter 3 3 Related Work Nowadays,
Page 48 and 49:
• multicasting: it takes the stre
Page 50 and 51:
expensive, fixed delivery and recep
Page 52 and 53:
3.1.6 Static vs. Dynamic Channels T
Page 54 and 55:
environment because they require a
Page 56 and 57:
H.261 is called video codec for aud
Page 58 and 59:
VideoScene (VS) VideoObject (VO) Vi
Page 60 and 61:
The emphasis of MPEG-7 will be the
Page 62 and 63:
Temporal scalability involves parti
Page 64 and 65:
multitude of streams. It can switch
Page 66 and 67:
increased linearly in the absence o
Page 68 and 69:
3.2.2.1 End-to-End Retransmission R
Page 70 and 71:
correctly received block. The missi
Page 72 and 73:
epresent user traffic. The delay ca
Page 74 and 75:
3.2.5 IP Signaling Protocols for Pa
Page 76 and 77:
two H.323 endpoints or between an e
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 4 4 Adaptive Packet Video T
Page 81 and 82:
4.1.1 Video Classification Model Pr
Page 83 and 84:
attributes can refer to the QoS par
Page 85 and 86:
In RBF, 2 D = X − is the distance
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 4-6: Experiment testbed In t
Page 89 and 90:
190 180 170 End-to-end delay MPEG-4
Page 91 and 92:
Sync Layer. The SL-packetized strea
Page 93 and 94:
conveyed by MIME format parameters
Page 95 and 96:
the same value. This timing informa
Page 97 and 98:
4.2.2.1 Fragmentation We propose to
Page 99 and 100:
Timestamp: Indicates the sampling i
Page 101 and 102:
When G is used as generator matrix,
Page 103 and 104:
4.2.3 Performance Evaluation Intens
Page 105 and 106:
0.3 0.25 our proposal classical app
Page 107 and 108:
lost packet at the receiver. Conseq
Page 109 and 110:
marking scheme. The server must be
Page 111 and 112:
The video server adds audio-visual
Page 113 and 114:
Marker (TR3CM) [131] to mark the ba
Page 115 and 116:
VO1 VO2 AVO Scenario Audio BL EL1 E
Page 117 and 118:
Throughput (Kbits) 3000 2500 2000 1
Page 119 and 120:
Throughput (Kbits) 3000 2500 2000 1
Page 121 and 122:
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000
Page 123 and 124:
45 40 Original Quality Received Qua
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 5 5 A Dynamic Packet Video
Page 127 and 128:
The TCM algorithm is based on a tok
Page 129 and 130:
BEGIN Initialize the classification
Page 131 and 132: User Profile (Token Bucket) Traffic
Page 133 and 134: 5.3.3 QoS Management Algorithm Spec
Page 135 and 136: Figure 5-7: Hierarchical aggregatio
Page 137 and 138: • Filters: to put packets into cl
Page 139 and 140: mechanism associated with the Drop
Page 141 and 142: Figure 5-16: Packets loss with IP D
Page 143 and 144: 5.5.2.3 Experimental Results Figure
Page 145 and 146: 1 MPEG-4 Based Layer Stream -AF11 M
Page 147 and 148: 0.2 0.18 MPEG-4 Based Layer Stream
Page 149 and 150: By using our PBNM tool, we allocate
Page 151 and 152: Id Condition Indicator Action 1 Net
Page 153 and 154: The proposed marking algorithm bett
Page 155 and 156: Chapter 6 6 A SIP/MPEG-4 Multimedia
Page 157 and 158: performed by many ways like SLA (Se
Page 159 and 160: 6.1.1.4 SIP Communication Model SIP
Page 161 and 162: • It assign a value (network sess
Page 163 and 164: 6.2.1 SIP2DMIF Subsystem The SIP2DM
Page 165 and 166: Step 1: The MPEG-4 Terminal passes
Page 167 and 168: 1. Set the result C to the empty se
Page 169 and 170: TCP/UDP port, our implementation us
Page 171 and 172: Control & Data Plan Video Rate Cont
Page 173 and 174: characteristics and relevance of ea
Page 175 and 176: References [1] Kazaa Media Desktop
Page 177 and 178: [43] B. Schuster, “Fine granular
Page 179 and 180: [79] D. Bansal and H. Balakrishnan,
Page 181: [115] N. Laoutaris, I. Stavrakakis,
Page 185 and 186: Appendix A A Appendix A: Overview o
Page 187 and 188: Media aware Delivery unaware ISO/IE
Page 189 and 190: A.3.3 Scene Description Streams Sce
Page 191: This appendix presents structure ex
show all

TITRE Adaptive Packet Video Streaming Over IP Networks - LaBRI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?