Guidelines on stock records for immunization programme - Path
Guidelines on stock records for immunization programme - Path
Guidelines on stock records for immunization programme - Path
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case study 2:<br />
During an EVSM assessment, the assessors have calculated the following <strong>stock</strong> status in the primary vaccine<br />
store in the country:<br />
Table 2. Vaccine <strong>stock</strong> status, Primary vaccine store<br />
Vaccine Quantity in Average M<strong>on</strong>ths<br />
hand by m<strong>on</strong>thly of supply<br />
2 September 03 c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>stock</strong><br />
DTP 463 330 251 683 1.8<br />
HepB 1 658 350 308 425 5.4<br />
OPV 1 360 150 425 874 3.2<br />
Measles 1 530 240 94 618 16.2<br />
BCG 353 800 107 291 3.3<br />
After this in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>solidated from inventory <strong>stock</strong> <strong>records</strong>, assessors went through batch cards to<br />
check the expiry dates of each batch to see whether m<strong>on</strong>ths of supply <strong>on</strong> <strong>stock</strong> is really achievable. Assessors<br />
also checked order plan and planned arrivals of each vaccine.<br />
Table 3. Analysis of <strong>stock</strong> situati<strong>on</strong> by expiry dates, Primary vaccine store<br />
Vaccine M<strong>on</strong>ths of Number of Latest First<br />
supply by batches expiry date planned arrival<br />
2 September 03 available in m<strong>on</strong>ths in m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />
DTP 1.8 1 6.0 0.5<br />
HepB 5.4 1 9.0 3<br />
OPV 3.2 2 4.0 1<br />
Measles 16.2 2 11.0 9<br />
BCG 3.3 1 7.0 5<br />
As seen from the above table, primary store had 16 m<strong>on</strong>ths of measles vaccine supply based <strong>on</strong> the<br />
assumpti<strong>on</strong> that average m<strong>on</strong>thly c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> would remain the same. There were no planned<br />
supplementary immunizati<strong>on</strong> activities <strong>for</strong> measles. Although <strong>stock</strong> <strong>records</strong> showed 16 m<strong>on</strong>ths of supply, this<br />
was found to be NOT achievable when expiry dates of the two batches were examined. The sec<strong>on</strong>d batch<br />
had the expiry date of July 2004 meaning that available <strong>stock</strong>s cannot be used bey<strong>on</strong>d this point. In reality,<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ths of supply should have been c<strong>on</strong>sidered as 11 m<strong>on</strong>ths rather than 16. Although DTP levels were found<br />
to be quite low (under the minimum <strong>stock</strong>), in 15 days there was a scheduled delivery of 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths of supplies.<br />
Based <strong>on</strong> this in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong>, assessors prepared the below graph to illustrate the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between the<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ths of supply and expiry dates by batches.<br />
(c<strong>on</strong>tinued)<br />
30<br />
Vaccine <strong>stock</strong> management – <str<strong>on</strong>g>Guidelines</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>records</strong> <strong>for</strong> immunizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>programme</strong> and vaccine store managers