01.06.2014 Views

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VI<br />

BOHMIAN <strong>MECHANICS</strong><br />

My suggestion is that at each state the proper order of operation of the mind requires<br />

an overall grasp of what is generally known, not only in formal, logical, mathematical<br />

terms, but also intuitively, in images, feelings, poetic usage of language, etc.<br />

— David Bohm<br />

But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave?” If only to point out what was<br />

wrong with it? [. . . ] Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be<br />

taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show<br />

that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental<br />

facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice?<br />

— John Bell<br />

We briefly describe Bohm’s hidden variables theory, which we will call Bohmian mechanics.<br />

Bohmian mechanics seems to have the same empirical strength as quantum mechanics, but succeeds<br />

to provide an image in space and time of what exactly takes place in micro - physical reality.<br />

VI. 1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The debate between Bohr and Einstein concerning the interpretation of quantum mechanics<br />

reached its peak in the 1935 EPR - article. Although both authors frequently returned to the problems,<br />

neither of them has afterwards introduced new elements in his point of view. For most of<br />

the physicists in the nineteen thirties and later it was not difficult to declare a winner to the debate,<br />

Bohr’s view was accepted nearly unanimously. The question whether a physical reality hides behind<br />

quantum mechanics, which exists of objects having properties and of which we can form ourselves a<br />

picture in space and time, was put aside. It was also thought that Von Neumann’s proof, as discussed<br />

in V. 2, p. 114, made a hidden variables reconstruction of quantum mechanics untenable.<br />

It is the merit of Bohm to have made a breach in the Copenhagen interpretation for the first time,<br />

by doing exactly that what was impossible or meaningless according to the Copenhageners. In 1952<br />

he published two articles in which he presented a HVT of quantum mechanics. In the second article<br />

he describes the breach as follows (Bohm 1952 part II, p. 188)<br />

The usual interpretation of the quantum theory implies that we must renounce the possibility<br />

of describing an individual system in terms of a single precisely defined conceptual<br />

model. We have, however, proposed an alternative interpretation which does not imply

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!