FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
VII<br />
BELL’S INEQUALITIES<br />
There is hardly a paper - nor was there any during the past two and a half decades -<br />
which deals with the foundations of quantum mechanics and does not refer to the work<br />
of John Stewart Bell.<br />
Bell’s theorem is the most profound discovery of science.<br />
— Max Jammer<br />
— Henry Stapp<br />
[. . . ] Bell is generally credited with having brought down a purely philosophical issue<br />
from the lofty realms of abstract speculation to the tangible reach of empirical investigation<br />
and of having thereby established what has been called ‘experimental metaphysics’.<br />
— Max Jammer<br />
The ‘Bell inequalities’ is a generic term for inequalities in terms of measurable physical quantities<br />
which are satisfied by hidden variables theories, but are violated by quantum mechanics. We will<br />
derive several Bell inequalities, belonging to different types of hidden variables theories. This<br />
also includes indeterministic, stochastic HVT’s, which fell outside the scope of chapter V.<br />
VII. 1<br />
LOCAL DETERMINISTIC HIDDEN VARIABLES<br />
VII. 1. 1<br />
DERIVATION <strong>OF</strong> THE FIRST BELL INEQUALITY<br />
Returning to the hidden variables theories, HVT’s, we focus our attention at a specific experiment.<br />
In the article ‘On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox’ (1964), J.S. Bell examines the EPR experiment,<br />
discussed in section I. 2, in a version which was given by Bohm and Aharonov (Bohm 1957),<br />
also called the EPRB experiment. Bohm and Aharonov proposed an experiment in which two spin<br />
1/2 particles are prepared in the singlet state and, next, move apart in opposite directions. After they<br />
are separated, the spin of each of the particles is measured in an arbitrary direction, where the spin of<br />
particle 1 is measured in direction ⃗a and the remote particle 2 in direction ⃗ b, as in figure III. 3, p. 73.<br />
In this experiment, one can follow the same argument as EPR. Using the notation of section III. 6,<br />
if measurement of ⃗σ 1 · ⃗a yields the value +1 then, for the singlet state, measurement of ⃗σ 2 · ⃗a must<br />
yield the value −1 and vice versa.<br />
Since the result of a measurement of a spin component of the one particle can be predicted with<br />
certainty by measuring the same component of the other particle, whereas the particles are far away