01.06.2014 Views

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VII<br />

BELL’S INEQUALITIES<br />

There is hardly a paper - nor was there any during the past two and a half decades -<br />

which deals with the foundations of quantum mechanics and does not refer to the work<br />

of John Stewart Bell.<br />

Bell’s theorem is the most profound discovery of science.<br />

— Max Jammer<br />

— Henry Stapp<br />

[. . . ] Bell is generally credited with having brought down a purely philosophical issue<br />

from the lofty realms of abstract speculation to the tangible reach of empirical investigation<br />

and of having thereby established what has been called ‘experimental metaphysics’.<br />

— Max Jammer<br />

The ‘Bell inequalities’ is a generic term for inequalities in terms of measurable physical quantities<br />

which are satisfied by hidden variables theories, but are violated by quantum mechanics. We will<br />

derive several Bell inequalities, belonging to different types of hidden variables theories. This<br />

also includes indeterministic, stochastic HVT’s, which fell outside the scope of chapter V.<br />

VII. 1<br />

LOCAL DETERMINISTIC HIDDEN VARIABLES<br />

VII. 1. 1<br />

DERIVATION <strong>OF</strong> THE FIRST BELL INEQUALITY<br />

Returning to the hidden variables theories, HVT’s, we focus our attention at a specific experiment.<br />

In the article ‘On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox’ (1964), J.S. Bell examines the EPR experiment,<br />

discussed in section I. 2, in a version which was given by Bohm and Aharonov (Bohm 1957),<br />

also called the EPRB experiment. Bohm and Aharonov proposed an experiment in which two spin<br />

1/2 particles are prepared in the singlet state and, next, move apart in opposite directions. After they<br />

are separated, the spin of each of the particles is measured in an arbitrary direction, where the spin of<br />

particle 1 is measured in direction ⃗a and the remote particle 2 in direction ⃗ b, as in figure III. 3, p. 73.<br />

In this experiment, one can follow the same argument as EPR. Using the notation of section III. 6,<br />

if measurement of ⃗σ 1 · ⃗a yields the value +1 then, for the singlet state, measurement of ⃗σ 2 · ⃗a must<br />

yield the value −1 and vice versa.<br />

Since the result of a measurement of a spin component of the one particle can be predicted with<br />

certainty by measuring the same component of the other particle, whereas the particles are far away

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!