FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I<br />
CONCEPTUAL PROBLEMS<br />
Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.<br />
— Niels Bohr<br />
I think it is safe to say that no one understands quantum mechanics.<br />
— Richard Feynman<br />
I. 1 INTRODUCTION<br />
Quantum mechanics emerged at the beginning of the 20 th century from an attempt to understand<br />
the interaction between atoms and radiation. The presence of discrete lines in the emission<br />
and absorption spectra of chemical elements indicates that this interaction takes the form of discrete<br />
quanta. When, in the years 1925 and 1926, a coherent theory was developed by the unified efforts of<br />
Werner Heisenberg, Paul Dirac, Max Born, Pascual Jordan, Wolfgang Pauli and Erwin Schrödinger,<br />
and this theory was axiomatized seven years later by John von Neumann, the question about the<br />
physical interpretation of the mathematical symbols of the theory arose.<br />
The central mathematical concept in quantum mechanics is ψ, in the form of a wave function ψ(q)<br />
in Schrödinger’s wave mechanics, or of a vector |ψ⟩ in Hilbert space, à la Von Neumann. According<br />
to Born, its physical meaning is that ψ determines probabilities for results of measurements, and a<br />
key question is then how such probabilities must be interpreted. By means of four examples we will<br />
give an idea of the conceptual problems raised by quantum mechanics.<br />
(i) Consider as a first example the decay of radioactive nuclei of a certain kind, as discussed by<br />
Einstein (P.A. Schilpp (1949, p.667, ff). We see the unstable nuclei decay at various times, one almost<br />
immediately, another only after a long time; the α - particles are radiated in ever different directions.<br />
Quantum mechanics describes these nuclei by a non-stationary wave function, and using this function<br />
one can calculate the expected lifetime of the nuclei.<br />
A natural reaction is to assume that the nuclei differ from each other, and that this difference is<br />
the cause of the mutually different individual life spans and the different directions the α - particles<br />
are radiated in. In this view, the quantum mechanical expectation value would be comparable to<br />
the average life span in a population. However, this does not fit in a natural way in the quantum<br />
mechanical description. Quantum mechanics describes all nuclei by the same wave function. If this<br />
description is complete, the fact that quantum mechanics gives only expected life spans is not due to<br />
a lack of knowledge. Rather, there simply is nothing more to know concerning the nuclei than their<br />
wave function and the probabilities that follow from it.<br />
On the other hand, we see before our eyes that the nuclei do not behave the same way, they decay<br />
at different times and send the α - particles in ever different directions. This suggests that more can