FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LIST <strong>OF</strong> FIGURES<br />
III. 1 A discontinuous measure for dim H = 2 . . . . . . . . . 48<br />
III. 2 A rotated unit vector in the xz - plane . . . . . . . . . . 68<br />
III. 3 Spin up for particle 1 along ⃗a, for particle 2 along ⃗ b . . . . . . 73<br />
IV. 1 Heisenberg’s γ - microscope . . . . . . . . . . . . 79<br />
IV. 2 The double slit interference experiment (Bohr 1949 ) . . . . . . 89<br />
IV. 3 Contexts of measurement in which the interference of the particles is visible,<br />
and those in which the recoil of the screen is visible, exclude each other. (Bohr<br />
1949 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90<br />
IV. 4 Several perfect crystal neutron interferometers (Rauch and Werner 2000 ) . 93<br />
IV. 5 The interference pattern in the neutron interferometer is acquired by measuring<br />
the intensity in the detectors at a variable optical path length difference. . 94<br />
IV. 6 The probability distribution in position for a slit of width 2 a . . . . 101<br />
IV. 7 The diffraction pattern for a small slit of width 2 a . . . . . . . 101<br />
IV. 8 The probability distribution in position for a double slit, 2 a is the width of each<br />
slit and 2 A the distance between the slits . . . . . . . . . 104<br />
IV. 9 The interference pattern for the double slit . . . . . . . . . 104<br />
IV. 10 Moving screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106<br />
V. 1 A solution for dim H = 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117<br />
V. 2 a) Kochen - Specker diagram b) Conway - Kochen diagram . . . . 118<br />
V. 3 M.C. Escher, Waterfall. Consider the 3 interpenetrating cubes on the top of<br />
the left pillar. Each cube has 4 lines from the mutual center to its vertices, 6<br />
lines to the centers of its edges, and 3 lines to the centers of its faces. Three of<br />
the lines are shared by all three cubes, giving 3 · (4 + 6 + 3 ) − 6 = 33 lines.<br />
These are Peres’ vectors. (Text Meyer 2003 ) . . . . . . . . 119<br />
V. 4 µ(P i ) = cos 2 θ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120<br />
VI. 1<br />
VI. 2<br />
The quantum potential for the two slit system as viewed from the screen, under<br />
assumption of a Gaussian distribution at the slits (Bohm 1989 ) . . . 131<br />
A simulation of the double slit experiment in Bohmian mechanics. Each particle<br />
follows a certain path between the slits and the photographic plate. All<br />
particles coming from the upper slit arrive at the upper half of the photographic<br />
plate, likewise for the lower slit and lower half of the plate. The twists in the<br />
paths are caused by the quantum potential U. (Vigier et al. 1987 ) . . . 132<br />
VII. 1 Thought experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen on the singlet . . . 140<br />
VII. 2 A configuration in which the spin quantities violate the Bell inequality . . 142<br />
VII. 3 The Bell inequality violated for every acute angle ϕ . . . . . . 143<br />
VII. 4 the configuration giving the largest violation of the Bell inequality (all vectors<br />
in the same plane) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143